ChaseDream

标题: 求教gwd1-29 [打印本页]
作者: coteki    时间: 2004-10-6 10:51
标题: 求教gwd1-29

Q29: B


Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.



  • Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.

  • Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election has estimated that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted.

  • Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted in the 2000 United States presidential election, a new study estimates.

  • A new study has cited faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places in estimating that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes that were cast had not been counted in the 2000 United States presidential election.

  • A new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, has estimated 4 million to 6 million votes had not been counted of the 100 million votes cast.

    • 这道题不选e是不是citing部分把主谓分开了？还是有其他原因？

    作者: 携隐    时间: 2004-10-6 11:06
    这是ETS最喜欢的陷阱之一,我把它叫作夹心饼干,就是一个分词出现在主谓之间,这种分词既可以作定语修饰主语又可以作状语修饰后面的谓语动词,典型的"斜视分词"(OG某题的解释,在靠后的部分,题号不记得了). 改进方案就是把夹心部分提到前面去明确作状语修饰谓语动词,(少数情况如果作定语的话改用定语从句或移到逗号前面),如B所示. GWD里有不少这样的夹心饼干题,你以后做到注意一下,很快就摸到规律了.
    作者: xealot    时间: 2004-10-16 14:10

    这是ETS最喜欢的陷阱之一,我把它叫作夹心饼干,就是一个分词出现在主谓之间,这种分词既可以作定语修饰主语又可以作状语修饰后面的谓语动词,典型的"斜视分词"(OG某题的解释,在靠后的部分,题号不记得了). 改进方案就是把夹心部分提到前面去明确作状语修饰谓语动词,(少数情况如果作定语的话改用定语从句或移到逗号前面),如B所示. GWD里有不少这样的夹心饼干题,你以后做到注意一下,很快就摸到规律了.

    XY, I don't think there is a so called 斜视分词. The term refers to an adverbial or an adjective modification between two objects, both of which could be modified by the adverbial or adjective phase or clause. But in this case, there is only one object could ever be modified by the participle: the new study.

    The most serious flaw of E, in my point of view, is that there should be a THAT after the "has estimated".

    作者: ke0902    时间: 2004-12-16 01:05
    好強!!!!
    作者: ke0902    时间: 2004-12-16 01:15
    好強!!!!
    作者: aloha    时间: 2005-7-2 13:53
    以下是引用携隐在2004-10-6 11:06:00的发言：
    这是ETS最喜欢的陷阱之一,我把它叫作夹心饼干,就是一个分词出现在主谓之间,这种分词既可以作定语修饰主语又可以作状语修饰后面的谓语动词,典型的"斜视分词"(OG某题的解释,在靠后的部分,题号不记得了). 改进方案就是把夹心部分提到前面去明确作状语修饰谓语动词,(少数情况如果作定语的话改用定语从句或移到逗号前面),如B所示. GWD里有不少这样的夹心饼干题,你以后做到注意一下,很快就摸到规律了.

    OG某题的解释,在靠后的部分,题号不记得了-OG245, choice E Squinting modifier

    作者: 爱睡觉的猫    时间: 2005-11-7 15:21
    以下是引用携隐在2004-10-6 11:06:00的发言：
    这是ETS最喜欢的陷阱之一,我把它叫作夹心饼干,就是一个分词出现在主谓之间,这种分词既可以作定语修饰主语又可以作状语修饰后面的谓语动词,典型的"斜视分词"(OG某题的解释,在靠后的部分,题号不记得了). 改进方案就是把夹心部分提到前面去明确作状语修饰谓语动词,(少数情况如果作定语的话改用定语从句或移到逗号前面),如B所示. GWD里有不少这样的夹心饼干题,你以后做到注意一下,很快就摸到规律了.

    JJ 好厉害哦　很恰当的比喻哦

    作者: benjaminshufe    时间: 2005-11-8 11:05
    以下是引用xealot在2004-10-16 14:10:00的发言：

    .


    XY, I don't think there is a so called 斜视分词. The term refers to an adverbial or an adjective modification between two objects, both of which could be modified by the adverbial or adjective phase or clause. But in this case, there is only one object could ever be modified by the participle: the new study.


    The most serious flaw of E, in my point of view, is that there should be a THAT after the "has estimated".


    同意同意，一开始选E，后来发现了没有that, 看来GMAT细心真的很重要！

    作者: seasnow    时间: 2005-12-31 04:41
    admire一下，这里的解释太强了，应该放到精华区！
    作者: mejor    时间: 2006-7-1 12:53
    xy乃一神奇女子，以后找老婆以其为标准。
    作者: xlhu    时间: 2006-7-22 03:23

     支持C!!

    The most serious flaw of E, in my point of view, is that there should be a THAT after the "has estimated".强烈支持该解释！！

    作者: hedge    时间: 2006-12-21 14:30

    D错在哪里了? 我怎么看都觉得D最简洁明了

    作者: simstarcn    时间: 2007-2-3 06:31

    B 句子重心发生转移了吧?

    原文中的been cited by 修改为has estimated that

    这样好吗?

    作者: LOUI1121    时间: 2007-2-3 15:15

    答案是B吧?

    XY说的对! 看OG的对于这种题的解释一般是如果前面一个单词(这题就是STUDY),后面一堆东西修饰它,那么最好把一些修饰成分提前,避免头轻脚重.

    作者: 阿土莎莎    时间: 2007-11-8 23:40

    我也选了E

    作者: snowofjune    时间: 2007-12-24 08:47
    我也选了E,现在想想是不是时态不对，不能用过去完成时？
    作者: zhiyou1004    时间: 2009-10-14 22:48
    还是不太明白E的具体错误。
    作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-11-1 21:56
    E 的错误包括
    1、citing...at polling places, 结构隔断主谓语，这样不好。携隐大牛说这是"夹心饼干"，但我觉得这与OG10 245 的情况有一点点差别，不过这种将现在分词结构插入主谓语之间的确容易造成歧义，应该将分词结构提前到句首。
    2、estimated 后的宾语从句少了 that，也有NN说 estimate 不用完成时态，但我对此观点有保留。
    3、用了过去完成时，count 不是连续动词，用过去时就好了。

    更多NN的讨论可以参考
    http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-59334-1-1.html
    作者: lmiltamy    时间: 2010-5-8 23:32
    弱的問一下,D錯在那裡??? 詳解D一下
    作者: AMBER513    时间: 2019-9-10 16:22
    xlhu 发表于 2006-7-22 03:23
     支持C!!The most serious flaw of E, in my point of view, is that there should be a THAT after t ...

    C选项的分词不能applied to the subject，所以肯定也是错的
    作者: AMBER513    时间: 2019-9-10 16:24
    lmiltamy 发表于 2010-5-8 23:32
    弱的問一下,D錯在那裡??? 詳解D一下

    D的时态有问题



    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3