ChaseDream
标题: 求教gwd 1-16 [打印本页]
作者: coteki 时间: 2004-10-6 10:48
标题: 求教gwd 1-16
Q16: 原答案C现选B
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
- a greater proportion than it was
- a greater proportion than
- a greater proportion than they have been
- which is greater than was so
- which is greater than it has been
为什么c不对啦?
作者: 携隐 时间: 2004-10-6 11:10
C的they指代谁? 从逻辑上应该指代"比例",从语法上复数they无法指代单数proportion,只能往前指代costs,逻辑错误,此其一. 其二,即使逻辑上没有问题,they可以指代costs,那么后面的have been是什么意思? 成本曾经是如何? 跟前面的accounted for动词不对应,要对应就得用have done
突然想起, MM问这些问题前有没有搜过以前的讨论?
作者: xiaonan8114 时间: 2005-2-23 06:41
我的英国朋友解释为THEY只能指人不能指物
作者: mmfoolish 时间: 2005-8-30 23:19
晚安,各位NN!
请问D/E中的which有什么问题吗?还有, greater有问题吗?谢谢!!!
作者: Ichase 时间: 2005-9-28 10:29
支持C, they have been 是说的现在,是到现在开始为止和所有以前的比较。有什么错啊。1992 是最耗电视费用的到目前为止。是用现在完成时啊。有什么错。
作者: boochxu 时间: 2006-9-28 00:04
正确答案到底是A,还是C啊。我认为应该为A才对。
作者: deuxteer 时间: 2009-7-5 23:24
正确答案貌似是B噢,刚才从别的帖子里纠结来的
作者: edmundshi 时间: 2009-7-5 23:38
accounted和previous election暗示这个句子的总时态应该是过去时,故C不对
作者: xfi883 时间: 2009-7-5 23:50
选B阿。
C的they从逻辑上应该指代"比例",从语法上复数they无法指代单数proportion,只能往前指代costs,逻辑错误,此其一. 其二,即使逻辑上没有问题,they可以指代costs,那么后面的have been是什么意思? 成本曾经是如何? 跟前面的accounted for动词不对应,要对应就得用have done.
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than the proportion that soaring television costs accounted(had accounted)for in any previous election. 这是完全版,按照省略法则, 把该省的省去就可以了。
A的it无指代对象,因为前面是"costs",要指也该是"they"
C的时态错了,前面一句话说1992年的事已经是过去时了,后面这句说"in any previous election",既然是"previous",那么一定是在1992年之前,如此一来就应当用过去完成时了.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-5 23:50:40编辑过]
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |