At hand is the issue about whether or not things doesn’t become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious.The consequence that things will become more complex and mysterious, the author points out, is resulted from more knowledge we acquire, statement that is in fact unilateral.The speaker overlooks some other significant elements such as certain social problems unique to the today's world.So, frankly, although the statement has its value to some degree, i don't think it is well defined to our current condition.
I read your article again, and I realize that the first sentence of this paragraph has a serious grammar problem.
"At hand is the issue of "why" things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious as people acquire more knowledge"
Second sentence: the consequence. . . "results from" (not "is resulted from")
-- by 会员 淡淡飞过 (2012/5/16 9:39:13)