标题: issue第三篇，求猛拍拍拍拍~~~！！！！ [打印本页] 作者: liucy 时间: 2012-5-13 16:00 标题: issue第三篇，求猛拍拍拍拍~~~！！！！ Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion an abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
I’m fundamentally believe that political leaders need to compromise to the public in order to make the right decision and to smooth the process of implement. That is also the reason why public elected them for---to accomplish the public benefits. However, only following the public requisite is not enough for a great leader. In a political game, a competence leader calls for a balance in both compromise to the public and uphold the fundamental principle.
To begin with, the mental function of a public leader is to fulfill peoples’ common wealth and protect the stable of society. And public, a gathering of individuals of society, is the primary factor for the leader s to achieve information and to evaluate the decisions. Thus, listening to peoples’ voice is a key step to ensure the successful of a policy. For example, there is an old saying in China, that people are like the water and the king is like a boat, water could both uphold and overturn the boat. Without considering peoples’ situations, leaders are more likely to walk on the wrong way, even end up forfeiting the political game.
The second reason why I agree with the assertion is due to the constitution of the political power. The advantage of vote is a necessary step for the electors to achieve the political power. So, compromising to the public and promising them a wonderful future is becoming a common phenomenon during the hustings. Moreover, the public support is also obligatory to maintain the effectiveness of the policy and to obtain respect among the opponents. Also, the progress of policy implement would be much more successfully if the public is involving in that of policy decision.
However, suggest that leaders should abandon their right to hold the principle is too extremely. Principle is like a kind of fundamental rule that we have to hold in order to make the right decisions and to prevent form making mistakes. As far as I’m concerned, the public leaders’ principle should be consisted of more factors than just compromise. For example, Lincoln, one of the most greatest presidents of America, manumitted millions of black slaver in 1878, even there is still amount of white people couldn’t resist the thought of racial discrimination. By holding the principle of liberty and equality, Lincoln created a whole new world with understanding and love. To sum up with, a wise public leader should be aware of the advantages by listening to peoples’ voice. But keeping the society work as an organism is not that easy. Upholding the principles of being a professional politician is also vital important.
作者: 普渡哥 时间: 2012-5-14 08:04
But keeping the society work as an organism is not that easy.