标题: GWD逻辑题请教 [打印本页] 作者: melody远行 时间: 2012-5-12 14:31 标题: GWD逻辑题请教 Historian:Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus.Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques.It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent.Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics.Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false.A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however.Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.
In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A.The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.
B.The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position.
C.The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.
D.The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.
E.The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence. 这题给的答案是D,可是我觉得第二个BF不是evidence而应该是结论。我的选择是B，因为第一个BF虽然在however之前，但是也是支持最终结论的作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2012-5-12 18:57
No.
The structure of the last part of the passage is:
Main Conlucion, however. Premise.
Basically the NORMAL structure should be: However, Main Conclusion. (Because) Premise or Since Premise, then, However, Main Conclusion.
However is used to indicate the rejection of other's opinion.