Two computer companies, Garnet and Renco, each pay Salcor to provide health insurance for their employees.Because early treatment of high cholesterol can prevent strokes that would otherwise occur several years later, Salcor encourages Garnet employees to have their cholesterol levels tested and to obtain early treatment for high cholesterol.Renco employees generally remain with Renco only for a few years, however.Therefore, Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Early treatment of high cholesterol does not eliminate the possibility of a stroke later in life.
B. People often obtain early treatment for high cholesterol on their own.
C. Garnet hires a significant number of former employees of Renco. D. Renco and Garnet have approximately the same number of employees.
E. Renco employees are not, on average, significantly younger than Garnet employees.
答案选c，不明白为什么c选项削弱了，这题我没选出来答案
作者: YuanHuang 时间: 2012-5-9 12:28
假如Garnet或Renco的员工脑梗了那么Salcor就要赔钱。Renco的员工若是短时间内跳槽去了一个不是Salcor保险的公司，那么Salcor是没有必要让R的员工去测胆固醇，反正钱不是S陪。假如说R的员工没有做胆固醇的测试跳槽去了Garnet（C选项），那么脑梗了钱仍就是Salcor来陪，所以C选项消弱了Conclusion：Salcor lacks any financial incentive to provide similar encouragement to Renco employees作者: InfiniteAlex 时间: 2014-9-19 21:50
2# perfect~~~~~~~~~~~~