标题: Absolute Phrases(独立短语)的问题 [打印本页] 作者: gui59106375 时间: 2012-5-8 12:30 标题: Absolute Phrases(独立短语)的问题 以下是曼哈顿里对于独立短语的解释 Absolute Phrases A few GMAT sentences use a sophisticated modifier called an Absolute Phrase. Absolute phrases are composed of a noun plus a noun modifler. These phrases do not have to modify what they touch; rather, they modify the main clause in some way.
Right: His head held high, Owen walked out of the store.提问：（这个句子不是run-on吗）
The absolute phrase His head held high is composed of a noun (His head) and a noun modifier (held high) that describes the noun. The phrase His head held high describes how Owen walked out of the store. Thus, this absolute phrase acts as a verb modifier.作者: gui59106375 时间: 2012-5-9 20:33
up作者: gui59106375 时间: 2012-5-10 15:56
up作者: gui59106375 时间: 2012-5-10 20:31
up作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2012-5-10 23:32
His head held high. Owen walked out of the store. -- 中间应该是逗号?作者: gui59106375 时间: 2012-5-11 09:51
恩，是逗号，可是这样就变成run-on了啊，求助版主NN作者: adimeisi 时间: 2012-8-12 21:56
今天我也看到这里，不明白，顶起来，希望看到的大牛们解释下作者: adimeisi 时间: 2012-8-12 22:02
自己感觉不一定对，请批评指正，我是这样理解的，run-on 两个句子是不相干的东西连一起了，仅仅用逗号隔开。这个独立短语（不知道和独立主格结构是什么关系）是主句的主语的相关信息的详述，也可以用with + 名词+ 非谓语动词来表达的。 看起来就是特别不顺的那种感觉，特别欠抽的作者: wellsli 时间: 2012-8-13 00:16
同意上面的分析诶~ 国外就是喜欢这样看问题：与主句相关的，都能解释的通。不相关的，即使是平常的语法点，也不通了...
然后我感觉，这里确实前后两句关系很紧密，连在一起好像逻辑上能说过去。作者: yakev6 时间: 2012-8-13 01:28
嗯，很灵活的一种动词修饰语 His head held high, Owen walked out of the store. ==>With his head held high, Owen walked out of the store. ==>Owen walked out of the store with his head held high. ==>Having his head held high, Owen walked out of the store. ==>Owen, having his head held high, walked out of the store. ==>Owen, his head held high, walked out of the store.作者: denniszhang 时间: 2012-8-16 19:47
按manhattan的解释，这里的held high是participle noun modifier，用来修饰his head，因此就不是一个完整的句子，就不存在楼主担心的run-on sentence的问题了。 这种动词修饰语还真是比较特别啊。作者: yakev6 时间: 2012-8-30 19:15
不会runon，absolue phrase 成分里面没有working verb,你看到那个held是 过去分词。作者: MidoriXIN 时间: 2023-12-7 08:51
his为开头的句子是不是不能算一个单独句啊，没说清楚指是谁啊