标题: Mozar music school。5.27。。 [打印本页] 作者: starrr91 时间: 2012-5-6 22:53 标题: Mozar music school。5.27。。 The following appeared on the Mozart School of Music Web site. "The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons. First of all, the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age levels; there is no audition to attend the school. Second, the school offers instruction in nearly all musical instruments as well a wide range of styles and genres from classical to rock. Third, the faculty includes some of the most distinguished musicians in the area. Finally, many Mozart graduates have gone on to become well-known and highly paid professional musicians."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
This short article suggests that choose the Mozart Scholl of Music is a right thing to do for parents who want to enroll their children for music lessons. Well-presented though, it is not that convincible. Some fallacious assumptions it makes weaken the credulity of the argument. The presentation of these so-called advantages don’t indicate it a good choice for children taking music lessons.
Firstly, that the music school welcomes youngsters at all ability and age levels seems not to be a good index for school-choosing. The author assumes that it is suitable for all youngsters, which is not valid. Some children may be too young to accept such intensive practice; at the first stage of their learning course, there should be some preschool instructs to the music lessons so that they could find where their interests really rely on instead of pack them to a school suits for all level students. It could only puzzle them rather than enlighten them. So, the school welcomes youngsters from all age and ability is not an element for a great music-learning place for young children.
Secondly, cited in this argument is the wide range of styles and genres as well as the categories of instruments they teach. Another invalid presupposition has been made that the Mozart Music School is good at teaching every instruments they list. There might be alternative possibility that the Mozart Music School has such options for enrolling students, but what they have got is just superficial education of all those kinds, which is not that fitting to those who appeal for more insightful music learning. A more specialized music school appears to be a better choice for those people.
Thirdly, even if the assumptions presented above turn out to be tenable, another flaw remains, inconvincibly, that the author implies their faculty who are distinguished musician is a good instructor too. As we all know that some great instructors of music are not really a pronounced player, while someone may be a magnet in the music profession is not a proper one for education. Without clarifying the capability of tutoring-not playing skills-of those faculties, under no circumstances could the author evince the Mozart Music School is the first choice for children who want to learn music.
Additionally, granted that all doubts cast above is solved by some ensuing evidence, this argument still remains inconvincible. One flaw leads to this invalidity is the author’s fallacious presupposition that the attainment of graduates and their tutoring accepted here are associated. While other possibility could supplant this assertion that may be it is the gifted ability of them that facilitates their success. No evidence implies the relationship between the education they offer and the achievement they’ve got. It cannot be a persuasive recommendation; they should put up some specific evidence to illustrate their crucial influence on these successful graduates, foreshadow the important role they play in this course rather than make a false impression on the parents that why they are success is due to their gifts, in this case, Mozart Music Scholl, to some degree, cannot be a good choice for public.
In sum, the author should fix their target mass rather than make this school a mixture for everyone and has no feature at all. Further, the false assumption he made should be carefully coped with.
求狠拍。。
作者: 竹林中人 时间: 2012-5-7 10:27
to the music lessons 这里用for也许好点 感觉这篇argument，LZ写的很不错啊，想的很到位，那几个质疑点写的很清晰