ChaseDream

标题: GWD-29-Q29 虚心请教！ [打印本页]

作者: masushuang 时间: 2012-5-4 13:31
标题: GWD-29-Q29 虚心请教！
40: GWD-29-Q29
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.
A.   year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B.   year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
C.   year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D.   year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
E.   year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

答案给的D，我选了C。想请问的是C中的比较（compared to)问题出在哪里？还有是previously的位置不对么？

作者: 浅浅123 时间: 2012-5-4 21:13
previously 是副词应该不能修饰$7吧

作者: christete 时间: 2012-5-20 21:17
看了http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc-scoetop-t1100.html
对A的解释是
"previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

但是我还是困惑A
为什么paying不能修饰句子最开始的students呢？

作者: purpleicee 时间: 2012-5-25 22:36

看了http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/sc-scoetop-t1100.html
对A的解释是
"previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

但是我还是困惑A
为什么paying不能修饰句子最开始的students呢？

-- by 会员 christete (2012/5/20 21:17:16)

是不是因为A里面没有转折的意思啊？比如 instead of 的那种意思

作者: 单调唱 时间: 2012-5-26 14:33

-- by 会员 christete (2012/5/20 21:17:16)

你自己看看paying和students的距离。优美么？让你，你会这么写么？？！修饰成分里修饰对象太远了

作者: wly1202m 时间: 2012-5-26 15:55
如果你想修饰students，那这里做的是伴随动作状语. OK，如果这样想是没有问题的.但是，你注意看下文章的逻辑意思，这里pay 7....的，它是一种比较，是属于that从句内容里面的一个比较，现在付的跟以前付的比较...如果你把这里定位成了修饰students，那就是伴随动作，是跟主句谓语并列了..
^-^.. 总而言之，这里主要的意思想说明的就是比较啦。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)