标题: Lsat 5-II-14 求教-->babypace转移 [打印本页] 作者: xixi 时间: 2003-6-25 17:38 标题: Lsat 5-II-14 求教 Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hours-up to 36 consecutive hours- that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.
Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?
Which one of the following , if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy's argument?
B. Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.
为什么选B，medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals 有什么作用？作者: mike1999 时间: 2003-6-26 12:46
这题可以理解为削弱题，即削弱P的结论。p的结论是没有必要改变工作时间，它的前提是以前的记录表明医生可以工作的很好。削弱的一种方法是找到前提的缺陷。选项B表明现在的重病号多了，所以要求医生更多的精力，反过来就是说情况变了，过去的纪录不适用了。所以前提有缺陷。所以选b作者: xixi 时间: 2003-6-26 13:21
thank you作者: zimerman 时间: 2005-4-11 13:26 标题: Lsat 5-II-14 求教-->babypace转移 是削弱q的结论！