ChaseDream

标题: gwd 7-1 [打印本页]
作者: hanson_luo    时间: 2004-9-26 02:39
标题: gwd 7-1

Although producer prices rose at an unexpectedly steep rate in September, analysts said that the increase resulted mostly from temporary factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be a resurgence of inflation.




  • factors and not necessarily foreshadowing that there would be

  • factors and not necessarily that it foreshadowed

  • factors and did not necessarily foreshadow

  • factors, while not necessarily a foreshadowing of

  • factors, while it did not necessarily foreshadow that there would be

    • 答案是C，E错在那儿呢？

    作者: kingsoft    时间: 2004-9-26 11:35

           1。罗嗦

           2。划线部分的内容也是分析家说的话，用while将两部分割裂开来，破坏句子

          

    作者: hanson_luo    时间: 2004-9-26 16:35
    我感觉主要是因为while引导的后面部分没有对比的意味，用while牵强
    作者: wojianiu    时间: 2005-3-23 06:40

    Seems C is the best answer,--no else is better...

    But do you think there is mistake in the sentence: The analyst said that the increase WAS resulted from...(there is no WAS in the sentence...)

    作者: ethyl    时间: 2005-5-24 10:47

    A：and前后谓语动词不平行；foreshadow用法awkward


    B：and前后结构不平行


    C：Concise and parallel, choice C is the best answer.


    D：把and换成whlie,平添比较意思；a foreshadowing of用法awkward


    E：同C；foreshadow从句不简洁

    作者: michellechang    时间: 2005-8-19 15:13

    LZM说there be必须后面跟具体名词，而inflation是抽象名词，排除AE先


    我觉得这条公理满好用的

    作者: happysandy    时间: 2005-11-5 06:34

    这题的e答案有没有主从关系不明确之嫌？


    （Although producer prices rose at an unexpectedly steep rate in September, analysts said that the increase resulted mostly from temporary factors,） while it did not necessarily foreshadow that there would be a resurgence of inflation.

    不知道二楼的NN的第二条是否也有这个意思？做题是就是觉得e罗嗦，现在分析下来感觉好像这里也有点问题，希望大家指正

    作者: advantage    时间: 2005-11-23 15:04

    选了c之后返回来想b,觉得也有可能是said that...and that...并列呢,不知道这样想问题在哪里,是因为那个not necessary,我觉得是改变句子愿意,但是想知道语法上有没有错误...

    作者: zhoujian    时间: 2005-12-16 14:18
    以下是引用wojianiu在2005-3-23 6:40:00的发言：

    Seems C is the best answer,--no else is better...


    But do you think there is mistake in the sentence: The analyst said that the increase WAS resulted from...(there is no WAS in the sentence...)


    WAS is not needed here.

    result from itself is a intransitive verb

    So we can say His illness resulted from bad food.

    Therefore, the usage of result here is correct.

    作者: wzparete    时间: 2006-2-16 20:08
    E，there would be a resurgence of inflation,抽象名词，错。
    作者: GMAT阿驴    时间: 2006-2-20 15:23
    it的指代是不是歧义呢?  指前面的rate还是后面的increase
    作者: imp01    时间: 2006-8-20 15:28

    同意楼上的

    而且用WHILE 的话ANALYSTS那句不知道是谁的从句了

    作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-10-27 09:57

    E选项罗嗦，且foreshadow与would be语义重复

    作者: sweetbeer    时间: 2007-3-20 17:20
    foreshadow that-clause正确吗，longman和金山都没这一说，搜google上确有
    作者: llxx1985cn    时间: 2007-6-9 22:42
    C选项里的did不能省略吗
    作者: orochisx    时间: 2007-6-10 15:15
    E项的罪名很多 啊
    作者: rabits5218    时间: 2009-8-29 00:09

    如果是專家說的話,那and後面為什麼沒有that 呢?

    作者: mars_cheung    时间: 2009-9-24 08:03

    回LS 的MM，did not foreshadow 和前面的 said 并列。foreshadow 后面不是一个完整的句子，因此不用 that 引导。

    而且，如果是两个 that 从句并列，需要用到 that...,and that... 结构，或者 said that... and foreshadowed that... 但明显比 C 项啰嗦。

    作者: elfgoer    时间: 2009-11-10 18:49
    did not foreshadow應該是跟resulted並列, 而不是跟前面的said並列
    這樣會變成analysts did not foreshow..., 不合句意



    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3