ChaseDream

标题: 219. (GWD-12-Q20) 从没有发现的问题，期待牛牛啊，快考了！ [打印本页]

作者: isa0709 时间: 2012-4-24 15:25
标题: 219. (GWD-12-Q20) 从没有发现的问题，期待牛牛啊，快考了！
219. (GWD-12-Q20)Approved April 24, 1800,the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government ofthe United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library ofCongress.
A. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for theremoval of the government of the United States to the new federal city,Washington, D.C., also established
B. The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provisionfor the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city,Washington, D.C., also established
C. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision forthe removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city,Washington, D.C., and established
D. Approved April 24, 1800,making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to thenew federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established (A)
E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for theremoval of the government of the United States to the new federal city,Washington, D.C., also establishing

答案是A，但A如果对的话，句子不是没有谓语吗？为什么都没有人问这个呢，难道是我的错？我选的E。E也不对，但A也不对。

作者: amiroven 时间: 2012-4-24 15:52
established就是谓语那。。。。

作者: isa0709 时间: 2012-4-24 19:43
up!

作者: isa0709 时间: 2012-4-24 19:44
establish前面有逗号啊，就是另一个分句啊，就是说前面的分句没有谓语啊！

作者: Linsky 时间: 2012-4-24 22:17
其实A里面有个插入语

作者: isa0709 时间: 2012-4-26 13:51
可是那个插入语并不是修饰主语的，而是就近修饰new federal city(that 从句里的成分），所以A如果对的话，变成了主语，谓语，这个不太合语法吧，因为没有插入语的话，没有理由将主语和谓语分开的呀，很多fragment的错误就是这样类型的错误。不解ing，牛牛们，啥时能出现啊！

作者: isa0709 时间: 2012-5-3 17:02
up

作者: ivyxiaoxiao 时间: 2012-5-21 10:51
同问~ 呼唤斑斑啊····

作者: naoyixue 时间: 2012-5-21 11:03
这句话的主语是the act of Congress， approved是过去分词，表示那个在1800年4月24日被approved的国会法案（此时用定于从句也修饰了发案的内容）established xxxx. 其实 subject ( the act) verb (establish)object ( library), 我不知道哪里是插入语言，烦请在把你的问题详细地说一下，我不是牛，

作者: ivanazhou 时间: 2012-6-30 23:14
一直想问为什么时间前面没有ON啊？Approved on April 24, 1800啊？

作者: gege112 时间: 2012-8-31 07:10
FROM manhattan：

that is, indeed, an independent clause. the problem is that it's a very long independent clause - the 'middleman' itself is longer than most actual sentences. that's a doozy.

remember that you should either condense or eliminate these interloping constructions (modifiers, prepositional phrases, and the like) so that you can better understand the structure of the sentence. if you do that here, you get the following:
the act that did X ... also did Y
that's an independent clause.

作者: gege112 时间: 2012-8-31 07:24
Also 只是一个副词，不像and 那些是连词

作者: wyw1018 时间: 2012-9-3 08:27
虽然限制性修饰语比较长，但是如果把also前面的逗号去掉，这样比较合理些。
或者限制性定语从句改为非限制性从句，also前面的逗号显得合理。

作者: x8mohuan 时间: 2012-11-28 11:33
貌似是啊。。

作者: dancingrain 时间: 2013-8-17 18:34

gege112 发表于 2012-8-31 07:10
FROM manhattan：that is, indeed, an independent clause. the problem is that it's a very long indepen ...

同意楼上。貌似mm的解释中也没有逗号的

作者: 小海豚yaoyao 时间: 2013-8-29 16:22
既然establish是唯一的谓语，同问also放在establish之前不会很奇怪吗？

作者: stella9249 时间: 2013-10-1 22:10
看完比较豁然开朗，是否可以理解为
approved..., the act of Congress established Library.

作者: supershuang 时间: 2014-11-12 05:34
dddddddddddddd

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)