标题: 几天没发，我又来冒泡了…LR 8# [打印本页] 作者: 玛莎丁丁 时间: 2012-4-23 12:53 标题: 几天没发，我又来冒泡了…LR 8# The number of aircraft collisions on the ground is increasing because of the substantial increase in the number of flights operated by the airlines. Many of the fatalities that occur in such collisions are caused not by the collision itself, but by an inherent flaw in the cabin design of most aircraft, in which seats, by restricting access to emergency exits, impede escape. Therefore, to reduce the total number of fatalities that result annually from such collisions, the airlinesshould be required to remove all seats that restrict access to emergency exits. Which one of the following proposals, if implemented together with theproposal made in the passage, would improve the prospects for achieving the stated objective of reducing fatalities？ （A） The airlines should be required, when buying new planes, to buy only planes with unrestricted access to emergency exits. （B） The airlines should not be permitted to increase further the number of lights in order to offset the decrease in the number of seats on each aircraft. （C） Airport authorities should be required to streamline their passenger check-in procedures to accommodate the increased number of passengers served by the airlines. （D） Airport authorities should be required to refine security precautions by making them less conspicuous without making them less effective. （E） The airlines should not be allowed to increase the ticket price for each passenger to offset the decrease in the number of seats on each aircraft.作者: 玛莎丁丁 时间: 2012-4-23 12:55
AB之间有点犹豫…求分析！作者: simonshen 时间: 2012-4-23 14:35
这题应该是B。如果航空公司多开航线以弥补因拆除座位而减少的载客量的话，那由于航班增多则会造成更多的collision出现，这样死亡人数也会增加。 A的话不一定需要满足。因为题目里说的规定本来就是要拆除飞机上阻挡逃生路的座椅。所以即使买来的新飞机有阻挡住emergency exits的座椅也会因为这个规定而被拆除，所以A这条有没有都没关系。