ChaseDream

标题: [求助]OG-13还没解决的疑惑 [打印本页]

作者: susanyaki 时间: 2004-9-25 02:32
标题: [求助]OG-13还没解决的疑惑

13. Defense Department analysts worry that the ability of the United States to wage a prolonged war would be
seriously endangered if the machine-tool manufacturing base shrinks further. Before the Defense Department
publicly connected this security issue with the import quota issue, however, the machine-tool industry raised the
national security issue in its petition for import quotas.
Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the machine-tool industry’s raising the issue
above regarding national security?
A. When the aircraft industries retooled, they provided a large amount of work for too builders.
B. The Defense Department is only marginally concerned with the effects of foreign competition on the
machine-tool industry.
C. The machine-tool industry encountered difficulty in obtaining governmental protection against imports on
grounds other than defense.
D. A few weapons important for defense consist of parts that do not require extensive machining.
E. Several federal government programs have been designed which will enable domestic machine-tool
manufacturing firms to compete successfully with foreign toolmakers.
og解释:

E is irrelevant to the industry's choice of strategy for securing import quotas!

但我觉得E是relevant的,只不过它和A B一样,解释了why the industry might not raise the security issue.即: 因为他已经获得了保护,所以没必要再借national security的题发import quota的挥了

NN来看一下吧

作者: cranberry 时间: 2004-9-25 10:28
og说的是它和问题没有关联，既然已经有这个program了，还提别的干什么？

作者: susanyaki 时间: 2004-9-26 00:06

我知道og是说没关系,

但我的解释为什么行不通呢??我觉得我的很有道理,

而且,解释题又不一定不能提其他的内容,所以我觉得你的解释好象不充足啊,

cranberry你可不可以仔细看看我的解释,然后详细点的说! 谢谢

作者: cranberry 时间: 2004-9-26 09:21
题目问的是为什么企业要通过提到国防的高度来解决产业保护问题，我想你把e理解成weaken了，其实不是，如果有weaken的意思的话，它weaken的也是企业的逻辑，而不能解释企业这样做的理由，因此就是无关的。

作者: 携隐 时间: 2004-9-26 17:31
MM，进口配额和能与国外厂商竞争是两回事情。

作者: susanyaki 时间: 2004-9-27 14:06

携隐B选项说The Defense Department is only marginally concerned with the effects of foreign competition on the
machine-tool industry.
所以你理解错了

不过谢谢楼上两位

作者: susanyaki 时间: 2004-9-27 14:11
cranberry,你能帮我去看看我提出的关于OG32,43,136,141,165的问题吗??为什么没人回答我,是不是我的问题太菜了???555555555555555555555555555

作者: agk99 时间: 2004-9-29 01:50

CR題做多了就會有你講的問題，我想，既然OG都講了E選項無關，而且廠商的請願行為也確實與國外企業競爭無關的時候，特別是C選項也真的比E好的時候，那麼就應該沒大問題了

本題是考閱讀，我一開始讀不讀，繞了一圈回來再讀，總算理解了

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-29 1:53:59编辑过]

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)