标题: 求教一题 [打印本页] 作者: bysapphire 时间: 2012-4-22 02:15 标题: 求教一题 When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies. Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"? (B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation? (C) Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf? (D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described? (E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects?
我选的是C 我没读懂文中的逻辑，我不明白他想说的是耳聋部分和回答部分分离，这句话是什么意思？分离情况下和他的前提 被催眠的人被告知耳聋之间 是个什么逻辑？ 我选c的话不正好质疑了 为什么在这种分离的情况下这些会接受他们耳聋，不正好质疑了他的逻辑过程？ 谢谢大家的帮助和回答作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2012-4-22 11:37
There are many good posts on this question. Search for them and you will understand the logic.
Separated means no communication therebetween.作者: liuliuy 时间: 2012-5-10 23:15
我觉得OG讲的还是满清楚的，上面说 题目给的是C项的答案，也就是说，C项是作为题目的问题。而且它并不能weaken题目的观点。题目说聋的部分和回复的部分分离了，被催眠的人可以回答出问题，说明他听得见。他用的是可以回复的那一部分，按照逻辑来讲，他应该说他听见了。而A选项刚好说明存在可以回答的那部分。作者: bysapphire 时间: 2012-5-13 00:11