12. Formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as they do to established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.
(D) Because new small businesses are growing and are seldom in equilibrium, formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to them in the same way as to established big businesses.(D)
(E) New small businesses are not subject to the applicability of formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity in the same way as established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.
og解释: Finally, the referent of they is not immediately clear in E.
1.为何ETS会这样说呢 they不是很明显指代前一句的主词New small businesses吗?还是因为有big businesses在前面? 所以在逻辑上无法很快就清楚 因为正确的(D)前面也有两个名词 但没有指代的问题
2.逻辑是否为指代的最高指标?判断的第一先决条件?
请大家帮忙确认一下 谢谢!!
Ethey可指代小企业也可指代大企业 因为逻辑上都说得通 所以指代不清
D是 do not apply to them in the same way as to established big businesses.(D)说明them 只能指代小企业
我认为逻辑意思是指代的第一条
got it!!
thanks , paopao
代词指代是否明确不是绝对的,判断时尽量不要用“代词指代不明”对选项做排除
可是本题如果不从代词指代不清开始,从那里入手呢??请NN指点!
代词指代确实比较伤神, 但有一些必错的指代可以判断:
1. 同一代词在同一句子里不能指代不同事物. (虽然有反例, 但总的来讲比较管用).
2. 代词不可指代所有格, 而要指代中心词.
3. 代词与其指代对象单复数必须一致.
而这题里they犯了第一条禁忌.
多谢薰衣草姐姐,你是我学习的榜样,刻苦,助人,聪明:)
但是照这一题ETS对A和B中THEY的解释,因为FORMULAS和THEY分别是主句和从句的主语,那么THEY就指代FORMULAS,但是如果这样的话,为什么还会说E中THEY指代不清呢,E中THEY是从句的主语,NEW SMALL BUSINESSES是主句的主语啊?请指教……
In A, the they after because is ambiguous; it seems illogically to refer to Formulas because they and Formulas are each the grammatical subject of a clause and because the previous they refers to Formulas.
前提是第一个they指,Formulas;
E中they前边两个主语都比较清晰,这样代词they的指代就成问题
說一下我個人的淺見 因為我代名詞指代也是一頭霧水
如果是because they***, S+ V...
則可以確定they=S.
但是如果是 S+ V...because they***
當they前面有兩個以上的多數名詞 這時候they就不一定是主詞了
很有可能是離他最近的多數名詞
這也就是為什麼BC的because they***的they並不會有奇異 但是E的有
個人淺見 還忘大家多多指教
說一下我個人的淺見 因為我代名詞指代也是一頭霧水
如果是because they***, S+ V...
則可以確定they=S.
但是如果是 S+ V...because they***
當they前面有兩個以上的多數名詞 這時候they就不一定是主詞了
很有可能是離他最近的多數名詞
這也就是為什麼BC的because they***的they並不會有奇異 但是E的有
個人淺見 還忘大家多多指教
我一点不同意哎~~这题OG地解释In A, the they after because is ambiguous; it seems illogically to refer to Formulas because they and Formulas are each the grammatical subject of a clause and because the previous they refers to Formulas.
实说这里的They就是指代Formulas 得,所以和楼上的说的S+V...,because they得情况就不对啦~~这题主要是是说they指代Formulas不和逻辑的,应该指代samll buessniss
說一下我個人的淺見 因為我代名詞指代也是一頭霧水
如果是because they***, S+ V...
則可以確定they=S.
但是如果是 S+ V...because they***
當they前面有兩個以上的多數名詞 這時候they就不一定是主詞了
很有可能是離他最近的多數名詞
這也就是為什麼BC的because they***的they並不會有奇異 但是E的有
個人淺見 還忘大家多多指教
同意 autumn713的看法
說一下我個人的淺見 因為我代名詞指代也是一頭霧水
如果是because they***, S+ V...
則可以確定they=S.
但是如果是 S+ V...because they***
當they前面有兩個以上的多數名詞 這時候they就不一定是主詞了
很有可能是離他最近的多數名詞
這也就是為什麼BC的because they***的they並不會有奇異 但是E的有
個人淺見 還忘大家多多指教
我一点不同意哎~~这题OG地解释In A, the they after because is ambiguous; it seems illogically to refer to Formulas because they and Formulas are each the grammatical subject of a clause and because the previous they refers to Formulas. -->OG的解释没有问题.这正说明这种情况下they会有指代不明的问题,和E犯了同一种错误.
-->OG的解释没有问题.这正说明这种情况下they会有指代不明的问题,和E犯了同一种错误.
实说这里的They就是指代Formulas 得,所以和楼上的说的S+V...,because they得情况就不对啦~~这题主要是是说they指代Formulas不和逻辑的,应该指代samll buessniss
这个让我想起了同一个指代问题:
OG中的某一题,题号不清,OG解释为:
performance of the tax officer 后面用them指代officer是可以的,但
the tax officer's performance 后面用them指代officer是不可以的,
說一下我個人的淺見 因為我代名詞指代也是一頭霧水
如果是because they***, S+ V...
則可以確定they=S.
但是如果是 S+ V...because they***
當they前面有兩個以上的多數名詞 這時候they就不一定是主詞了
很有可能是離他最近的多數名詞
這也就是為什麼BC的because they***的they並不會有奇異 但是E的有
個人淺見 還忘大家多多指教
我一点不同意哎~~这题OG地解释In A, the they after because is ambiguous; it seems illogically to refer to Formulas because they and Formulas are each the grammatical subject of a clause and because the previous they refers to Formulas.
实说这里的They就是指代Formulas 得,所以和楼上的说的S+V...,because they得情况就不对啦~~这题主要是是说they指代Formulas不和逻辑的,应该指代samll buessniss
赞同对A的解释,而E中New small businesses are not subject to the
applicability of formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity in the same way as established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.
they前有small businesses 和big businesses,they从逻辑上可以指代任一个,出现意思混淆,指代不清,不同A
同问~~到底哪个指代所有格哪个指代中心词?
还有按照longbai妹妹的例子,performance of the tax officer 后面用them指代officer是可以的,如果按照薰衣紫草的观点,这句话中performance不是中心词么?怎么没有指代中心词呢? the tax officer's performance 后面用them指代officer是不可以的,按照这个例子,就应该是无法指代所有格了吧 还有,one和ones指代中心词的,这个规律有人验证过么? 这几天光看指代问题了。。发现越看越晕。。
the tax officer's performance 后面用them指代officer是不可以的,按照这个例子,就应该是无法指代所有格了吧
还有,one和ones指代中心词的,这个规律有人验证过么?
这几天光看指代问题了。。发现越看越晕。。
the tax officer's performance 后面用them指代officer是不可以的,按照这个例子,就应该是无法指代所有格了吧
还有,one和ones指代中心词的,这个规律有人验证过么?
这几天光看指代问题了。。发现越看越晕。。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |