ChaseDream

标题: prep 07_sec2_88 就验证 [打印本页]

作者: 19900620    时间: 2012-4-8 23:31
标题: prep 07_sec2_88 就验证
88. (29179-!-item-!-188;#058&004217)
Because Miranda, the smallest moon of Uranus, has a large number of different surface features,
including craters, mountains, valleys, and fractures, some astronomers suggest that at one time
repeated impacts broke the surface apart, and after which the fragments were subsequently
rejoined because of
mutual gravitational attraction.
(A) repeated impacts broke the surface apart, and after which the fragments were subsequently
rejoined because of
(B) repeated impacts on the surface broke it apart, after which the fragments having rejoined with
(C) through repeated impacts that the surface broke apart, after which the fragments subsequently
rejoined by
(D) the surface broke apart with repeated impacts, after which the fragments having rejoined
through
(E) the surface broke apart as a result of repeated impacts, after which the fragments rejoined
through




我当时排除ABC的时候是考虑which,也就是说after which 所强调的是前一句所有的动作结束以后会怎么样怎样


所以相当于指代了前面的句子或者是动作,而实际上并不能如此。


我的理解是对的吗?可是在笔记里木有讲过这一点。不知道自己是不是想多了
作者: ttturtlett    时间: 2012-4-9 00:05
which 不能指代前一句子或動作,獨立主格伴隨語態才行。
我想這裡是代repeated impacts.
作者: 19900620    时间: 2012-4-9 08:33
which 不能指代前一句子或動作,獨立主格伴隨語態才行。
我想這裡是代repeated impacts.
-- by 会员 ttturtlett (2012/4/9 0:05:27)

那就是指代的重点在impacts啊?那就是说我的想法是错的是吧?
我之前还以为是ABC中使which指代了  连续的碰撞其表面  这整个事了=。=因为after么


貌似真的想错了


谢谢LS
作者: ttturtlett    时间: 2012-4-9 09:52
A) repeated impacts broke the surface apart, and after which the fragments were subsequently
rejoined because of
(B) repeated impacts on the surface broke it apart, after which the fragments having rejoined with
(C) through repeated impacts that the surface broke apart, after which the fragments subsequently
rejoined by
(D) the surface broke apart with repeated impacts, after which the fragments having rejoined
through
(E) the surface broke apart as a result of repeated impacts, after which the fragments rejoined
through

我給你的我排除點好了,
(A),and after which ,  and 前後該要平行,應該要有一個新的句子,但這裡確是after which,而且which 沒有指代對像,另外after跟 subsequently 是redundancy.

(B)it 可能指Miranda 或是 surface 造成ambiguity , which 沒有指代對象,having rejoined 讓人搞不清楚是had rejoined 還是 have rejoined .

(C)除了which 沒有指代對象 ,還有 after 跟 subsequently 是redundancy 之外,句子還很awkward .




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3