标题: OG 126 是不是有点矛盾啊，that不是要靠近所修饰对象么 [打印本页] 作者: kevin405hu 时间: 2012-4-4 10:37 标题: OG 126 是不是有点矛盾啊，that不是要靠近所修饰对象么 that引导的定语从句不是要靠近所修饰的对象么，为什么下面的这个题可以不用，如果从结构上来讲，(E)是可以的吧，虽然逻辑意思说不通，但(A)不是明显违反了SC的原则么？请大牛指教啊。。。什么情况下可以不用靠近呢
126. The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses. (A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses (B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn (C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses (D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious (E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn作者: kevin405hu 时间: 2012-4-4 10:39
有时候在阅读中也会碰到定语从句引导词不靠近修饰对象的情况，难道并不用遵循这个原则？只看逻辑意思就好了么？作者: bobdog159 时间: 2012-4-4 10:46
in an individual 属于修饰成分，可以看成形容词，that不会指代修饰成分的名词，就如 A of B that或者 A of B，which中的 that和 which一般都修饰 A，OG里面很多这种原话作者: movcn 时间: 2012-4-4 11:11
E选项中 create的逻辑主语应该是 reaction,而不是individual.
