ChaseDream

标题: Question on OG explanantion of 192 [打印本页]

作者: usdream 时间: 2004-9-19 16:43
标题: Question on OG explanantion of 192

Cajuns speak a dialect brought to southern Louisiana by the four thousand Acadians who migrated there in 1755; their language is basically seventeenth-century French to which has been added English, Spanish, and Italian words.

(A) to which has been added English, Spanish, and Italian words

(B) added to which is English, Spanish, and Italian words

(D) with English, Spanish, and Italian words having been added to it（C）

(E) and, in addition, English, Spanish, and Italian words are added

Here, why D is wrong?

OG's explanation is D offers an awkward adverbial construction, which cannot be used to modify nouns

However, I don't know what it means. Is that to say " adverbial construction" can not be used to modify nouns?

Additionally, with-clause is really complex, which is also involved in the dicussion about GWD 9-3.

Could NN please give me any help?

Thank you!

作者: usdream 时间: 2004-9-19 17:19

可否请牛牛们解答一下啊， up 一下先

作者: LES 时间: 2004-9-19 17:40
having done/having been done的形式，即分词的现在完成式，永远不能作后置定语。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)