The popularity of jazz in M is another question should be disputed. Although thepeople who attended the M's jazz festival over 100,000 at last summer, the author fails to assume that all these audients are from M. Besides, the fact of jazz musicians living in M might not be a justifiable reason, and even the highest-rated radio program in M is about jazz, which might indicate that the preference of the radio listeners may be jazz music.On one hand, the festival of jazz would be known to many jazz fans outside M by Internet or other methods, thereby, the author's assumption is quite absolute without some reasonable evidence.On the other, when people finding a place to live, they may consider many conditions, like the local environment, the traffic , and the price of the area.Even if they are musicians, they are still ordinary people.If the author could make more survey for the reason for why the musicians choose the place, or consider the number of the audients participate in the study of the rate of program, the question might be resolved.
The last point I want to discuss here is the study around the nation which emphasis the spending of jazz fans used for jazz entertainment on each year.The entertainment of jazz is not only in a jazz club.The people who are fervent to listen the jazz music are willing to have jazz entertainment in many interesting ways.Further more, the survey of the fans is in a nationwide range which is including M but not the same as M.The cited $1,000 spending for each fan in a year is an average number in the country, and it could not represent the actual condition of M.Apparently, the author should add more details of M which may be useful to prove the conclusion.
To sum up, if the author could make more survey or consider the number of the audients participate in the study of the rate of program, the digit may be justified.Besides, the residents in M are able to enjoy jazz in the other club so the distance would not be a question to them. Actually, the author should add more details of M may useful to prove the conclusion.