ChaseDream

标题: OG CR 分册 Q43 求解 Laws requiring the use of headlights...... [打印本页]

作者: henryuan    时间: 2012-3-27 08:22
标题: OG CR 分册 Q43 求解 Laws requiring the use of headlights......
43.Laws requiring the use ofheadlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However,since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries. In fact. the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as
would drivers who did not use their headlights.
(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States, poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.
(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have Daytime headlight laws.
(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.
(E)Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.E

毛毛OG CR 分类中答案分析为:离赤道越远,DHL理应更有效阻止车祸,但是离赤道很远的国家有DHL的只有美国;DHL可以减少摩托车事故(摩托车?)。其他有该法律的国家距离赤道都比美国近,而DHL并没有十分有效(否则不会只有美国有该法律)。文章中好象没有提到美国有相应的法律,这里的解释分析是不是弄反了?
In fact. the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States
这句话的意思是:实际上,那些有这样法律的国家比起美国大陆更远离于赤道。
请问 is the continental United states, is 的前面省略了什么吗?这里的结构读起来非常的拗口,哪位大神帮忙解释一下,或者,IS 在这里可以被省略掉吗?谢谢!

作者: henryuan    时间: 2012-3-27 08:46
举例:1) So we should all maintain an optimistic belief that the world is more forgiving than is commonly supposed.

因此我们都应该保持一种乐观的信念:这个世界比人们普遍认为的更为宽容。
the world is more forgiving than (the world) is commonly supposed 这里应该省略了the world,
2)Theresultis a middleclassmorevulnerabletohardshipandinsecuritythan isoftengrasped

这个结果表明中产阶层对困难和不安全因素比通常理解的更脆弱。回到上题,应该是the countries are farther from the equator than the continental United states is , 前面有ONLY, 所以,is 需要 倒装提前,这样理解正确吗?
这个结果表明中产阶层对困难和不安全因素比通常理解的更脆弱。回到上题,应该是the countries are farther from the equator than the continental United states is , 前面有ONLY, 所以,is 需要 倒装提前,这样理解正确吗?
作者: xn8510    时间: 2012-3-27 16:39
the countries are farther from the equator than the continental United states is , 前面有ONLY, 所以,is 需要 倒装提前,这样理解正确吗?
-- by 会员 henryuan (2012/3/27 8:46:49)



个人理解如下:
该句中,than的后面是个倒装句,省略了表语far from the equator,正常语序为:...than the continental United States is far from the equator. 在GMAT中,表语置于句前,全句倒装,于是就变成了:...than far from the equator is the continental United States.又由于该比较分句中的表语,与前面主语的表语相同,因此,可以省略,最后就变成了:...than is the continental United States.

这里的only,不是倒装的标志。只有Only位于句首引导状语从句时,才倒装,比如:Only when the meeting is over can we know the decision.此处的only仅仅作定语修饰countries,因此不能说是倒装结构的标志。

本题的逻辑可以这样理解:实施该项法律的国家,距离赤道比美国距离赤道远——所以,这些国家白天的能见度比美国白天的能见度要低(从since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator可得知)——所以,该项法律对于这些能见度低的国家,更加有效(从any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries可得知)——由此,推出E选项:该项法律在美国的实施效果,会比不上其在那些已经实施的国家的效果。
作者: henryuan    时间: 2012-3-27 18:47
标题: 感谢你的回复,你的语法基础很扎实,向你学习
the countries are farther from the equator than the continental United states is , 前面有ONLY, 所以,is 需要 倒装提前,这样理解正确吗?
-- by 会员 henryuan (2012/3/27 8:46:49)




个人理解如下:
该句中,than的后面是个倒装句,省略了表语far from the equator,正常语序为:...than the continental United States is far from the equator. 在GMAT中,表语置于句前,全句倒装,于是就变成了:...than far from the equator is the continental United States.又由于该比较分句中的表语,与前面主语的表语相同,因此,可以省略,最后就变成了:...than is the continental United States.

这里的only,不是倒装的标志。只有Only位于句首引导状语从句时,才倒装,比如:Only when the meeting is over can we know the decision.此处的only仅仅作定语修饰countries,因此不能说是倒装结构的标志。

本题的逻辑可以这样理解:实施该项法律的国家,距离赤道比美国距离赤道远——所以,这些国家白天的能见度比美国白天的能见度要低(从since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator可得知)——所以,该项法律对于这些能见度低的国家,更加有效(从any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries可得知)——由此,推出E选项:该项法律在美国的实施效果,会比不上其在那些已经实施的国家的效果。
-- by 会员 xn8510 (2012/3/27 16:39:04)


作者: cegret    时间: 2012-7-29 10:40
同赞一个~
作者: 醒醒Shine    时间: 2014-4-3 12:21
xn8510 发表于 2012-3-27 16:39
the countries are farther from the equator than the continental United states is , 前面有ONLY,  ...

楼主的回答逻辑解释得很清楚了。
我当时错选了D。就仅从应试的角度快速选出正确答案,分析下D和E的区别:
D和E的区别仔细体会:D变成了一个绝对值的collisions的数量大小比较,而E是对headlight的effective在做结论,不涉及数量级。从原文出发,一直在谈的是effective的问题。——如果是取非:D取非了就是,就算laws在US不如其余的有效,不代表collision是的数量一定也更高啊。如果是一个本身collisions就很高的国家跟US比呢,那不是就有可能尽管比US的effective好,但是collisions的数量更高?
E相反就不会有这个漏洞问题存在。
作者: 醒醒Shine    时间: 2014-4-3 12:31
哈哈 好开心  我又发现了一个答题点!

此题的难点在于要找准选项中说的 in the countries that have the laws指的是什么国家,我一开始做错就是武断了判断 in the countries that have the laws的范围。做错的时候是认为, in the countries that have the laws为什么一定要是题内这些距离赤道比US远的国家呢?如果还有别的用了法律但是比US近的,那不是就错了吗?这是典型的不看题干自己发散!!
顺着原题找:
in the countries that have the laws(原文依据:In fact. the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States. 原文都说了是the only了,不要怀疑了!)--距离赤道比US远的国家(原文依据:any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries)--比US更effective使用headlight的国家--正确结论E
作者: 醒醒Shine    时间: 2014-4-3 12:32
自己感叹下,GMAC出题的严谨+1
作者: Liangll    时间: 2017-9-3 10:11
毛毛理解错那句话了,应该是说有这个法律的国家距离赤道要比美国距离赤道远
作者: Hellen啊    时间: 2019-8-8 09:55
我也觉得那个毛毛OG解释有问题,lawyer里的解释时一样的,反了。赞xn8510
作者: Bensontuo    时间: 2019-8-9 20:11
Spot the question type: Infer/ Must be true

If Laws required use of headlights during daylight hours ---> Prevent automobile collisions.

Daylight visibilities is worse in countries far away from equator ---> certain laws would be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries

Laws required use of headlights during daylight hours ---> courtiers farther than the equator than the USA.

Let us see the answers.

A. It is not necessary true, since if use the headline could prevent collisions, without the law, it should be " less likely " for those driver to be involved in the collisions versus drivers who don't.

B. It it also not necessary true, which is to say, it could be one of the factor that seriously contribute to the collisions, but it does not really necessary to be either the most important one or less important to the others.

C. It is also not necessary true, since without the law, you can still use the headlight in USA, and if that's true, than it is must not necessary for USA to have more collisions versus the other countries with laws.

D. It is hard to say if there are any other factors also contribute to the collisions.

E. So, we know that laws would be more effective in countries with less day light visibilities. So, not less day light visibilities, it must be true that it would not be more effective.

Not to be more effective containing could be interpreted as either be the same effective or be less effective.

E -Correct answer.
作者: ClainsJL    时间: 2021-7-16 10:33
其实这题的难点主要是最后一句的倒装形式……




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3