ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-0206-2-15【interpretation】 [打印本页]

作者: pocahontas 时间: 2004-9-16 12:16
标题: LSAT-0206-2-15【interpretation】

[attachimg]20072[/attachimg]
key's B

我觉得这里的gap存在于imposing meaning on a work和writer's intentions之间。B说的是facts about the interpreter，文中好像没有提到呀。

为什么C和D不对呢？

作者: robertchu 时间: 2004-9-16 13:17

This is an interesting question.

The argument says "... so interpretations need not consider the writer's intentions". But C says "A writer's intensions are relevant to a valid interpretation of the writer's book". Obviously C is contradict to the argument, and therefore is not an assumption the author relies on.

The argument never touches the issue whether the true intentions of the writer can be known to a critic, therefore, D is not relevant.

Now try deny test on B. Deny B, we get "A meaning imposed on a literary work does not reflect facts about the interpreter." If so, the argument, "Any interpretation of a literary work tells more about the critic than about the writer" would fall apart – there won’t be much to reflect about the critic. Therefore, B is a necessary assumption and the best answer.

作者: pocahontas 时间: 2004-9-23 08:37
^^b got it~ thax robert!

作者: litheliluo 时间: 2004-9-24 13:53
这道题我虽然选对了答案，但整道题的逻辑意思不是很明白。麻烦NN们解释一下，拜托！！

作者: cranberry 时间: 2004-9-24 18:30

先翻译下吧，比较搞的题目。从主体部分开始：对文章的诠释首要是先赋予文章一个涵义而不是发现其内在的涵义，所以其不必考略作者的意图。因此，任何诠释都更多地反映了诠释者而非作者。

这下看起来简单了吧，其实就是一个逻辑上的gap，怎么诠释者赋予它某个涵义就导致了诠释反映了他的啥子了呢?必须假定，这个他给涵义时就反映了他的东东

作者: litheliluo 时间: 2004-9-24 20:58
标题: LSAT-0206-2-15【interpretation】

以下是引用cranberry在2004-9-24 18:30:00的发言：

对文章的诠释首要是先赋予文章一个涵义而不是发现其内在的涵义，所以其不必考略作者的意图。因此，任何诠释都更多地反映了诠释者而非作者。

原来这个interpreter=critic，懂了，谢谢！

作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-5 17:48

pocahontas 发表于 2004-9-16 12:16
[attachimg]20072[/attachimg]key's B我觉得这里的gap存在于imposing meaning on a work和writer's intenti ...

Spot the question type: Necessary Assumption

Core of the argument:

Regardless of the interpretations are relevant to a literally work our not, it must reflects more about the critic than about writer.

Well, then apparently, the necessary assumption is - the interpretation must be relevant to the interpreter.

Let's see the answers.

A. After negating it, it only does say that you can tell whether it is possible to tell the differences between the valid interpretations or not. It does not even touch the core of the argument.

B. After negating it, if it does not reflects the fact about the interpreter, then how could you conclude that any interpretation of literary works tells more about the critic than about the writer? Correct answer.

C. After negating it, Whether it is relevant or not does not prove the fact that it does tell more about the interpreter or does not tell more.

D. Even it can be known, we can still either more about the critic or not be able to know more about the critic.

E. It does n to really relevant to the argument.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)