ChaseDream
标题: LSAT-0112-3-26【fifth force】 [打印本页]
作者: pocahontas 时间: 2004-9-15 20:42
标题: LSAT-0112-3-26【fifth force】
[attachimg]20058[/attachimg]
key's E。E是怎么加强的?那么B为什么不行呢?
作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-9-15 20:59
B is absolutely right. E is wrong
作者: pocahontas 时间: 2004-9-15 22:11
E错是不是因为E里面提到的是postulated,而B里面说的是established theory?
作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-9-15 22:34
标题: LSAT-0112-3-26【fifth force】
假设的东西不能证明力的存在。
作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-5 13:16
Spot the question type: Strengthen
Core of the arguments:
if it could explain smaller measurement of the gravitational attraction than the established theory predicted, then it must be true that the variables to conduct the measurements from both the previous 4 forces and 5 are the same, and If the variables are the same, then it also must be true that the outcome of examining 5th force must not contradict any theories of current existing 4 forces.
Let us dive into the answers.
A. It does not support the conclusion that the theory of 5th force must exist.
B. Just as what we discussed - Keep in contender.
C. Weaken
D. Weaken
E. 誘惑答案, 重點來了, 我們說檢驗中兩種理論的對照組中各種變因一定要相同, 這裡是說, 第五力元素的理論是跟其他物理理論發展時一起被假設, 一起被假設不代表此假設一定對。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |