ChaseDream

标题: og 258 [打印本页]

作者: leslie123456789    时间: 2004-9-14 21:40
标题: og 258
        

258. The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.

(A)        that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning

(B)        that the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, had been earning

(C)        that there was an elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, and it earned

(D)        the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and was earning

(E)         the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and that it earned

Choice A, the best answer, uses the idiomatic construction noted... that and clearly focuses on the salient information-- a comparison of annual earnings. In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides ..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant--that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information. Also, the past perfect had been improperly places the elephant's earning in the past, prior to Wootton's; consistent verb tense is needed to show that the actions are simultaneous. Choice C may be faulted for distortion of meaning and diminished clarity because it suggests that the point of Wootton's example was the elephant's very existence; comparative earnings are presented (after and) as incidental detail. Choice D is awkward and inexact; the whole circum­stance that Wootton "noted" is best expressed in a clause that begins with that. Choice E does not use the idiomatic construction noted that x; therefore, and that it earned has no parallel construction to which it can be joined.

答案A为什么用过去进行时啊?用一般过去时不就可以了吗?怎么感觉ets出题越来越不严谨了呢?。。。。。。请指教,谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-14 11:02:26编辑过]

作者: rhod    时间: 2004-9-17 16:42

Yes, I think the past tense should be Ok here.

But in GMAT philosophy, you are required to choose the best answer, not the perfect one. So don't expect ETS to test you with a question in a 严谨 way you prefer.


作者: 携隐    时间: 2004-9-17 19:40

过去时表示过去某个时点的动作,不具有延续性,跟后面的anually搭配不恰当。而后面的earned是和then以及as。。。搭配的,说明是“作为director那个时候,那个时点”所赚钱的水平,因此用过去时。


作者: leslie123456789    时间: 2004-9-20 11:04
谢谢两位rhod,携隐!预祝携隐jj在即将来临的考试中取得骄人的成绩。。。一定能!
作者: mba174    时间: 2004-12-13 00:23
In B, the structure of noted... that the elephant, giving rides ..., had been earning falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant--that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information. Also, the past perfect had been improperly places the elephant's earning in the past, prior to Wootton's; consistent verb tense is needed to show that the actions are simultaneous.

非常不理解ETS关于B的解释, 哪位NN赐教?急救啊!!

作者: bryan0806    时间: 2004-12-22 17:12
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=48976

我覺得這帖的tianwan解釋的挺好

應該就是限制性定從與非限制的差別吧


作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-4-15 21:37

(A)  that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning

请问哪位能解释一下,为什么要用进行时吗??

谢谢


作者: 薰衣紫草    时间: 2005-4-16 09:43
我是靠比较做出来的, 时态是个难点.
作者: goodwish    时间: 2006-1-1 17:23

用过去进行式是为了强调一种状态,用以更形象的比较.


Open to discuss...


作者: irisqingyu    时间: 2006-3-2 23:14
其实关于这里的过去进行时态,我感觉也是很奇怪,而且也影响了句意
作者: hyte    时间: 2006-3-11 20:49
我覺得用was earning沒啥問題! 因為主要是說在某個時間點正在做的事~~以這題來說就是,大象一邊讓小孩騎乘一邊也賺進了許多錢! (中文我翻的不好~ 抱歉)
作者: jonathan1987    时间: 2008-8-3 16:44
ding




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3