ChaseDream

标题: 小菜求HELP~!!!!!!这句话神马意思?! 我都没有找到主谓宾有木有~! [打印本页]

作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-20 16:53
标题: 小菜求HELP~!!!!!!这句话神马意思?! 我都没有找到主谓宾有木有~!
Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks.

小菜先给出自己的翻译,但我感觉不对应该:

世界各地的发展中国家已经积累了7000亿刀的负债;在这个危机关头....

剩下的就有问题了,我没有找到主语,感觉should这句话是部分倒装,后半句is开头的才是句子真正的谓语&宾语~

please help me to find:主语~~~~~
小菜抱拳啦


作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-20 16:53
芝麻来人
作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-20 17:05
芝麻来人
作者: babybearmm    时间: 2012-3-20 17:16
Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks.

Basically, the meaning of the part after the semicolon is:
If a significant number of these debts are repudiated, the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks is at stake.

at stake = at risk; in question
As long as you understand all the words, you can simply use common sense (perhaps a little bit of financial background knowledge required) to figure out the meaning. You are right that the subject "the solvency" comes after the verb "is".

Here is how the structure works:
There is a book.
On the table is a book.
At stake is the solvency.
Beginning with the above sentence, we insert a modifier and use a pair of commas acting as boundaries:
At stake, ___________, is the solvency.
See, we arrive at the correct sentence.


Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks.

小菜先给出自己的翻译,但我感觉不对应该:

世界各地的发展中国家已经积累了7000亿刀的负债;在这个危机关头....

剩下的就有问题了,我没有找到主语,感觉should这句话是部分倒装,后半句is开头的才是句子真正的谓语&宾语~

please help me to find:主语~~~~~
小菜抱拳啦

-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/3/20 16:53:25)




作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-20 17:53
Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks.

Basically, the meaning of the part after the semicolon is:
If a significant number of these debts are repudiated, the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks is at stake.

at stake = at risk; in question
As long as you understand all the words, you can simply use common sense (perhaps a little bit of financial background knowledge required) to figure out the meaning. You are right that the subject "the solvency" comes after the verb "is".

Here is how the structure works:
There is a book.
On the table is a book.
At stake is the solvency.
Beginning with the above sentence, we insert a modifier and use a pair of commas acting as boundaries:
At stake, ___________, is the solvency.
See, we arrive at the correct sentence.


Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should a significant number of these debts be repudiated, is the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks.

小菜先给出自己的翻译,但我感觉不对应该:

世界各地的发展中国家已经积累了7000亿刀的负债;在这个危机关头....

剩下的就有问题了,我没有找到主语,感觉should这句话是部分倒装,后半句is开头的才是句子真正的谓语&宾语~

please help me to find:主语~~~~~
小菜抱拳啦

-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/3/20 16:53:25)




-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/3/20 17:16:48)

原来如此~!!谢谢baby姐O(∩_∩)O哈哈~真是恍然大悟~
那么,句子中的should 按照baby姐的意思,是说should=if 吗?对于这句话而言~ 并且能否由此说明should也有类似if做条件的意思呢?
麻烦baby姐啦~
作者: 浅浅123    时间: 2012-3-20 19:58
should a significant number of these debts be repudiated 但是这句话的正常语序为if a significant number of these debts should be repudiated,应该为虚拟语气的啊 ,为什么主句不用would could should might的呢?
作者: babybearmm    时间: 2012-3-21 06:18
问得好!说实话,我不清楚,我只是模糊处理,就说理解句子要表达的意思是
If _____, the solvency is at risk.
然后知道是考s-v agreement,"at risk is the solvency" 相当于 "there is a book". Done!

个人觉得这道题很不像GMAT风格,毕竟GWD有些题目本来就可疑,Ron一直强调stay away from SC 1000. 用should这么倒装,也许British english可以这么说,但american english不喜欢。

见Manhattan SC p. 250
Finally, express a condition by using the word if, not by inverting the subject and adding a
modal verb such as should. This inverted construction is considered awkward by the GMAT.
Awkward: SHOULD he PASS the test, he will graduate.
Right: IF he PASSES the test, he will graduate.
作者: AmoHolmes    时间: 2012-3-21 08:53
Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should{ a significant number of these debts be repudiated}, “is”  【the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks】.

发展中国家在世界的多个方面累积了700 B的债务;    在危机关头,大量的这些债务应当会被拒付,(但)这是在世界上某些最大的跨国银行的偿付能力(所能承受的)。



个人理解。还望高人指正。
作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-21 10:01
问得好!说实话,我不清楚,我只是模糊处理,就说理解句子要表达的意思是
If _____, the solvency is at risk.
然后知道是考s-v agreement,"at risk is the solvency" 相当于 "there is a book". Done!

个人觉得这道题很不像GMAT风格,毕竟GWD有些题目本来就可疑,Ron一直强调stay away from SC 1000. 用should这么倒装,也许British english可以这么说,但american english不喜欢。

见Manhattan SC p. 250
Finally, express a condition by using the word if, not by inverting the subject and adding a
modal verb such as should. This inverted construction is considered awkward by the GMAT.
Awkward: SHOULD he PASS the test, he will graduate.
Right: IF he PASSES the test, he will graduate.
-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/3/21 6:18:57)

谢谢baby姐啦~~!!!
看来sc的重点还是像baby姐以前帖子说过的四点:平行,主谓一致,修饰词位置,代词~
其他的即使先暂不考虑,句子的主要句意也应该能八九不离十~
作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-21 10:03
Developing nations in various parts of the world have amassed $700 billion in debts; at stake, should{ a significant number of these debts be repudiated}, “is”  【the solvency of some of the world's largest multinational banks】.

发展中国家在世界的多个方面累积了700 B的债务;    在危机关头,大量的这些债务应当会被拒付,(但)这是在世界上某些最大的跨国银行的偿付能力(所能承受的)。



个人理解。还望高人指正。
-- by 会员 AmoHolmes (2012/3/21 8:53:05)

谢谢亲,你可以参考帖子中baby姐的回复~小菜觉得关键在于找到主语~
作者: bob9603    时间: 2012-3-21 10:05
should a significant number of these debts be repudiated 但是这句话的正常语序为if a significant number of these debts should be repudiated,应该为虚拟语气的啊 ,为什么主句不用would could should might的呢?
-- by 会员 浅浅123 (2012/3/20 19:58:37)

浅浅亲,这个问题我也不是很清楚,但是我觉得这应该不是这句话的重点~你可以等等nn们的其他解释~或许有帮助




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3