D) is the answer. Very simple correlation and causation type of question. A --> B. No A--> No B is a strengthener.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/3/18 0:14:16)
那请问一下大牛,我的分析是对的吗?
D) is the answer. Very simple correlation and causation type of question. A --> B. No A--> No B is a strengthener.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/3/18 0:14:16)
那请问一下大牛,我的分析是对的吗?
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/3/18 0:20:09)
D) is the answer. Very simple correlation and causation type of question. A --> B. No A--> No B is a strengthener.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/3/18 0:14:16)
那请问一下大牛,我的分析是对的吗?
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/3/18 0:20:09)
On the right track but you added an extra assumption (antibody works against herpes virus). A better way is to stay: the antibody binds to the protein target (premise).
The conclusion of the argument is:
antibody causes the K disease.
The strengthener says:
Without the antibody, there is no K disease.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/3/18 0:32:04)
原来如此,NN说的真是很准确~
楼主好,我不知道对不对哈,我这道题选D~
我觉得是这样,这个hypothesis理解一下,就变为:
(anti——h)导致k,即 (抗体 对 h 作用) ,才能得到 k
也就是说,要想得到k,anti 和 h 两者缺一不可~
而这道题问的是:找出另一个解释,来支持这个hypothesis~
那来看D:There are mice that are unable to form antibodies in response to herpes infections
前半句的意思就是:有k,没有 anti
and these mice survive these infections without ever developing keratitis.
后半句的意思是:得不到k
小菜以为,这种说法就符合了我刚才说的: 要想得到k,anti 和 h 两者缺一不可~
所以小菜选D~
按我的思路咱们再看C,大意就是:有h,没有k,老鼠还产生出和....一样多的anti~那这不就anti和h都有了,那k不就应该有了吗?所以C自然是错的~
我觉得如果思路和我一样,那么你就应该选的出来D~
不知道我的分析对不对啊,求楼主确认答案~~~~~~~~~~
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2012/3/17 23:29:10)