ChaseDream

标题: 新G issue 10 [nature类] 求拍本人第四篇 [打印本页]

作者: jdef1028 时间: 2012-3-17 21:45
标题: 新G issue 10 [nature类] 求拍本人第四篇
Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implement the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position

The recommendation in the article asserts that it is necessary to pass a law to preserve the wildness, ignoring the possibly commercial profits in any case. It might be tempting to agree with the assertion on the view of ecology. However, the speaker fails to consider the local circumstances, and even overlooks the possibilities that the economic development and the wildness protecting are not contradictory.

The implicit rationale behind the speaker's statement seems to be that commercial development is the bane of the extinction of animals, and also the terrible environmental problems. Admittedly, the development of the wildness areas, actually damaged the balance of the nature. While developing the areas, humans, focusing on the economic values, fails to account for their natural or ecological values, which might influence much more profoundly. The law, being used to penalize the one who destroy the wildness, would more powerful than the moral eduction of preserving them.

On the other hand is a compelling argument that it is hasty to take the recommendation without considering the local circumstances, especially the economic one. Though for some countries such as American, the government have enough budget to preserve the wildness, the countries or provinces struggling against the starvations or poverties would take the economic development at the first place, while they could not afford the disbursement to preserve the remaining wildness at the same time. For instance, in southeast China, people who live in the deep mountain, would lose their jobs if hewing the trees in the forest is forbidden. In this condition, the law for preserving the wildness, would get a sort of contradictions , and even might not be passed in the certain areas.

Furthermore, rather than choose one side of the commercial and environmental values, we would likely prefer to get a eclectic way, which preserves the wildness and make the area profitable. Here comes a compelling example, the Yellowstone National Park. Established by the U.S. Congress and signed into law in 1872, Yellowstone, widely held to be the first national park in the world, is known for its wildlife and its many geothermal features. Since the mid-1960s, at least 2 million tourists have visited the park almost every year. Hundreds of employees work for Yellowstone National Park, managing hotels and also gas stations, stores and most of the campgrounds. In this case, preservation of the wildness could settles the problem of employment and propels the locally economic development, as well.

In final analysis, as we evaluate whether to develop the area of remaining wildness, we should include both the natural value and the economic analysis. A eclectic way, which get both sides of the values, would be the best solution, in my view.

作者: 普渡哥 时间: 2012-3-17 22:03
A eclectic way,

A should be an.

总体写的挺好。

作者: jdef1028 时间: 2012-3-17 22:13

A eclectic way,

A should be an.

总体写的挺好。

-- by 会员普渡哥 (2012/3/17 22:03:03)

谢谢普渡哥
有一个问题想请教，就是我记得XDF时候杨子江老师说eclectic有贬义的含义，有没有更好的替代...或者说我记错了...

作者: 竹林中人 时间: 2012-3-18 21:33

A eclectic way,

A should be an.

总体写的挺好。

-- by 会员普渡哥 (2012/3/17 22:03:03)

谢谢普渡哥
有一个问题想请教，就是我记得XDF时候杨子江老师说eclectic有贬义的含义，有没有更好的替代...或者说我记错了...

-- by 会员 jdef1028 (2012/3/17 22:13:16)

compromising

作者: 竹林中人 时间: 2012-3-18 21:41
关于你举例子的部分，我觉得还不够，你只是说了结果，就是黄石国家公园取得了很好的效益，但你缺少的是指出这个公园到底是怎么做的，这点很重要。比如说，我让你说说怎么能够做到保护野生环境和经济发展和谐共存，你就说你看看人家黄石国家公园，现在怎么样的好，因为做到了和谐共存，但你没有告诉我它到底怎么做的。这是我们很多人举例子的一个弊端，例子讲完了，就算是论证完了，并没有建立起例子和论点之间的直接联系，即使这个联系是显而易见的，我们也要写出来。

作者: jdef1028 时间: 2012-3-23 00:03

关于你举例子的部分，我觉得还不够，你只是说了结果，就是黄石国家公园取得了很好的效益，但你缺少的是指出这个公园到底是怎么做的，这点很重要。比如说，我让你说说怎么能够做到保护野生环境和经济发展和谐共存，你就说你看看人家黄石国家公园，现在怎么样的好，因为做到了和谐共存，但你没有告诉我它到底怎么做的。这是我们很多人举例子的一个弊端，例子讲完了，就算是论证完了，并没有建立起例子和论点之间的直接联系，即使这个联系是显而易见的，我们也要写出来。

-- by 会员竹林中人 (2012/3/18 21:41:52)

是不是在中间加一句：为了在保护自然环境和满足游人旅游需求中达到平衡，黄石需要聘请更多的员工参与公园的治理和维护，这也就给当地带来了就业机会。。。这一类具体化的描述？？？？谢！！

作者: 竹林中人 时间: 2012-3-23 11:34

-- by 会员竹林中人 (2012/3/18 21:41:52)

-- by 会员 jdef1028 (2012/3/23 0:03:35)

是的

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)