ChaseDream

标题: prep07-132 [打印本页]

作者: rainbowmanutd 时间: 2012-3-15 04:05
标题: prep07-132

A recent review of payscales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay thanblue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

(A) that CEO's nowearn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to aratio of 42 times

(B) that, on average,CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that comparesto 42 times

(C) that, on average,CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42times their pay, the ratio

(D) CEO's who now earnon average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 timestheir pay, the ratio

(E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 timesthe pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

选C, 但是their不会有指代歧义吗

作者: jarod_elf 时间: 2012-3-15 04:34
CEO's are plural, no ambiguity

作者: rainbowmanutd 时间: 2012-3-16 03:32

CEO's are plural, no ambiguity

-- by 会员 jarod_elf (2012/3/15 4:34:51)

为什么不会指代workers?

作者: clairexuan9 时间: 2012-3-16 04:04
B. that, on average,CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that comparesto 42 times

这个选项是否ration容易造成歧义，而变成是workers的同位语？

作者: powerlgx 时间: 2012-3-17 15:46
ls, a ratio和workers完全不是一类东西，不可能成为同位语的

作者: powerlgx 时间: 2012-3-17 15:52

CEO's are plural, no ambiguity

-- by 会员 jarod_elf (2012/3/15 4:34:51)

为什么不会指代workers?

-- by 会员 rainbowmanutd (2012/3/16 3:32:11)

你是对的，从逻辑上来看是不可能指代CEO's的，把整个句子补全是这样的
……as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio……
……as it (419 times the pay of blue-collarworkers) is compared to 42 times their pay, the ration……
their要是指代CEO's的话，句意变为CEO's的收入是workers的419倍又是自己（CEO's）42倍，这个是不可能的吧，所以只能指代workers

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)