标题: 新GRE阅读理解36套--EX7 【求高手其原因】 [打印本页] 作者: jurat911 时间: 2012-3-2 16:39 标题: 新GRE阅读理解36套--EX7 【求高手其原因】 The use of heat pumps has been held back largely by skepticism about advertisers‘ claims that heat pumps can provide as many as two units of thermal energy for each unit of electrical energy used, thus apparently contradicting the principle of energy conservation.
Q: If the author‘s assessment of the use of heat pumps is correct, which of the following best expresses the lesson that advertisers should learn from this case? (A) Do not make exaggerated claims about the products you are trying to promote. (B) Focus your advertising campaign on vague analogies and veiled implications instead of on facts. (C) Do not use facts in your advertising that will strain the prospective client‘s ability to believe. (D) Do not assume in your advertising that the prospective clients know even the most elementary scientific principles. (E) Concentrate your advertising firmly on financially relevant issues such as price discounts and efficiency of operation.
我个人认为答案是D，可答案不是D。 why not D, why C ???? 求高手其原因作者: jurat911 时间: 2012-3-2 16:41
虽然这篇很短的，难度也不算大。 我个人认为答案是D， 可不是。 why not D, why C作者: adidadi 时间: 2012-3-2 18:13
我也刚做了这题，跟你一样错。。。。 后来找到原题，是老GRE一篇长文章的首段和其中一道原题。 D错了因为clients是知道most elementary scientific principle--就是这个能量守恒定律，所以才会怀疑。 选C 。原题是后面的几段长文字解释了这个多出来的energy是为什么，大致是转换成evaporator了神马的。。。 要是考试真这么考，我可能排除法了。。。作者: jurat911 时间: 2012-3-2 22:09
good for you
