ChaseDream

标题: OG 12 SC 65 句意解释！求助 [打印本页]

作者: sharon20 时间: 2012-2-29 20:34
标题: OG 12 SC 65 句意解释！求助
65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed
building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline
and act as a buffer,so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.

(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb

问题：这个句子的结构：the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocksthat

黄色部分到底是嘛意思啊？不懂~~

作者: sharon20 时间: 2012-2-29 20:52
本题答案选C
absorbing 在这里是修饰谁呢？我的理解是：

SVO,V-ing 结构中 V-ing 有两种用法 1. 修饰主句的主句，与主句谓语动词同时发生，表伴随。
2. 修饰前面整句话，表结果。
另外， V-ing 结构不能修饰主句的宾语。

所以这个句子中主语是 army corps of engineers, 不可能发出 absorbing的动作。所以 absorbing 表示结果，修饰前面整句话。

求证！！！我理解的对不对？？？

作者: sharon20 时间: 2012-3-1 13:27
up

作者: babybearmm 时间: 2012-3-1 18:34
你对这个句子的断句有些问题，应该是：

the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that ____________

换句话说， parallel to shore是状语表示"where"

A proposed building a breakwater of rocks that ____.
Question: where would the breakwater of rocks be built?
Answer: Parallel to shore.

至于v-ing，你版面搜索"v-ing"吧，已经讨论得很详尽了

65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed
building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline
and act as a buffer,so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.

(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb

问题：这个句子的结构：the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocksthat

黄色部分到底是嘛意思啊？不懂~~

-- by 会员 sharon20 (2012/2/29 20:34:17)

作者: 弹词 时间: 2012-3-2 21:17
分词前面是主谓宾结构+逗号，优先考虑是作为状语修饰前面的动作，（在时态合适的情况下）表示的是伴随或者是结果。否则作为定语修饰前面的名词

分词前面是主系表结构+逗号，修饰的是分词结构前面的词，作为定语。

作者: sharon20 时间: 2012-3-2 21:25

你对这个句子的断句有些问题，应该是：

the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that ____________

换句话说， parallel to shore是状语表示"where"

A proposed building a breakwater of rocks that ____.
Question: where would the breakwater of rocks be built?
Answer: Parallel to shore.

至于v-ing，你版面搜索"v-ing"吧，已经讨论得很详尽了

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/3/1 18:34:58)

太感动了~~~baby姐亲自回答我问题~~I am so lucky~

作者: iaoinging 时间: 2013-8-27 15:25
没有人纠结它主谓一致的问题么。OG里面说a breakwater...acts as...但是答案和句子里用的都是 rise and act，是因为前面有虚拟动词would所以要加动词原形么？？？？那如果没有would的话这个主意a breakwater of rocks的谓语是不是要用单数？？？？？

作者: zardl 时间: 2014-4-29 18:42

iaoinging 发表于 2013-8-27 15:25
没有人纠结它主谓一致的问题么。OG里面说a breakwater...acts as...但是答案和句子里用的都是 rise and act ...

同问啊！！找了好几个帖子了怎么没人理这个点啊。。。根据曼哈顿和题意这个主语也应该是a breakwater啊！

作者: 大Rong 时间: 2014-6-17 06:32

zardl 发表于 2014-4-29 18:42
同问啊！！找了好几个帖子了怎么没人理这个点啊。。。根据曼哈顿和题意这个主语也应该是a breakwater啊 ...

a breakwater that would rise....and [would] act as....
that 跳过of rocks修饰breakwater
因为这里的of phrase不表示从属。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)