Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.
(D) to provide free cashing of government checks, creating basic savings accounts to carry
(E) to provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts that carry
Choice D loses parallelism by dropping the conjunction and', a modification problem results because the participial phrase creating ... attaches to the noun checks, thus distorting the meaning of the last element of the parallel construction.
这两题比较晕,原来我以为现在分词加逗号后肯定就不可能做定语,做定语修饰肯定是紧紧跟在所修饰词的后面,现在看来不是如191,OG的解释明显给出是做定语,还有看OG39,PROTECTING的做作用,我查了以前的贴子到底做定语和状语争论不休,看了半天还是不明白到底做什么.
我的问题是:怎么判断分词结构是做定语呢还是状语,根据逻辑意思吗?
我手头没有语法书,希望大家讨论讨论
39题中protecting的作用是状语无疑，因为OG解释中明确说明：because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did，很明显，OG是将protecting看作修饰前面整个动作的，所以只可能是状语；
对于191，我个人看法是OG在D的解释上有些问题，其实，前面已经有一个完整的句子了，所以逗号后的现分一般总是做状语的，所以，如果如OG所说creating修饰check的话，至少creating前的逗号必须去掉；
另：当然，逗号后的现分并不一定都作状语，有时也可能做定语修饰名词，而这种情况仅发生在逗号前不是句子，而是一个名词结构。
同问：
问题(1)noun+comma+doing,请问doing修饰noun or the subject of the whole sentence?(2)if the comma is omitted, then doing modifies the subject of the sentence
同问：
问题(1)noun+comma+doing,请问doing修饰noun or the subject of the whole sentence?(2)if the comma is omitted, then doing modifies the subject of the sentence
一般说来1的doing修饰整句做伴随状态，有表原因、结果等意思，2的doing修饰前面的名词；但是好像曾经讨论到OG有出现为了避免岐义而省略逗号的情况，一时间记不起来是那道。
MM搜搜分词吧，好像在关于分词修饰泛指和定从修饰特指的贴有提及。
Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.
(D) to provide free cashing of government checks, creating basic savings accounts to carry
(E) to provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts that carry
Choice D loses parallelism by dropping the conjunction and', a modification problem results because the participial phrase creating ... attaches to the noun checks, thus distorting the meaning of the last element of the parallel construction.
这两题比较晕,原来我以为现在分词加逗号后肯定就不可能做定语,做定语修饰肯定是紧紧跟在所修饰词的后面,现在看来不是如191,OG的解释明显给出是做定语,还有看OG39,PROTECTING的做作用,我查了以前的贴子到底做定语和状语争论不休,看了半天还是不明白到底做什么.
我的问题是:怎么判断分词结构是做定语呢还是状语,根据逻辑意思吗?
我手头没有语法书,希望大家讨论讨论
这个问题我是这么看的:现在分词在句尾,与主句仅以一个逗号格开,分词是做状语表伴随;但这题没这么简单,主句和分词间隔着一个不定式,也可以说可以把分词理解为就近修饰不定式中的名词的.所以解释说做定语修饰check.
191. Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, [to provide free cashing of government checks, (creating basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.)]这么理解比分词大老远地去就是主句要合理
也就是说,由于被不定式格开,根据就近原则,现在分词只能修饰最近的名词.
这种中间隔着一个成分的修饰问题也是一个考点其他题目中也有体现..
Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, to provide free cashing of government checks,
and to create basic savings accounts that carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.
这句话什么意思?
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |