Avantasia 发表于 2005-4-4 19:53
大家帮忙看一下吧
8./DQ808 The proposed health care bill would increase government regulation of health insurance, establish standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers changing jobs who otherwise could be uncovered for months.
(A) establish standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers changing jobs who run-on/
(B) establishing standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers who are changing jobs and
(C) to establish standards that would guarantee wider access to people with past health problems and to workers who change jobs that jobs could be uncovered错/ to establish意思表达错
(D) for establishing standards that would guarantee wider access for people with past health problems and workers changing jobs who（B）表目的，用不定式好/access to
(E) for the establishment of standards that would guarantee wider access for people with past health problems and workers who are changing jobs that表目的，用不定式好/access to / jobs could be uncovered错
如果C后面的内容与B一致
唯一区别在于c :to establish B:establishing
哪个好 为什么
谢谢
分词作状语一般表示伴随，而不定式常常表示目的。这里用作伴随更合适一点。
不定式很复杂，可以用作主语（一般形式主语it替代，或者to do is to do）宾语，定语（多出现在名词之后起补充说明），状语（多表示目的，放在句首居多，同in order to)。
如果C后面的内容与B一致
唯一区别在于c :to establish B:establishing
哪个好 为什么
还是分词好， 除去伴随比目的好以外，这样 句子，to do的结构好像比较少吧
OG中确实有很多句子+to do是错误答案,但是楼上的观点有什么理论根据吗, 例如OG185, 是因为找不到主语吗?
还是其它的, 另外不定式修饰是否要求主语必须明确呢?!
谢谢大家!
不定式表示结果的时候主语可以是前面的句子, 刚才查过了薄冰的高级英语语法.
但是这里面为什么用不定式就不好呢?
还是不理解, 谢谢大家了!
这里的分词修饰的是前面整个句子，The proposed health care bill would increase government regulation of health insurance， 起的是伴随状语的作用。
如果使用to do 形式，要有明确的动作发出者，不是The proposed health care bill ，也不是government regulation of health insurance它们都不能独自establish。
分词的用法可以参阅以前的帖子。
谢谢JerJer, 你回答了我很多问题, 感谢, 另外问一句, 如果分词在句尾做结果状语, 主语可以是前面的句子吧?!
呵呵，不用客气。
分词在这种位置，有时候表达主句动作和分词所表达的动作同时发生，动作的发出者可以是前面的句子的主语。
但有时候，（如这一题）就只表示前面句子内容所导致的结果，动作的发出者你可以认为是前句那整件事情。
Avantasia 发表于 2005-4-4 19:53
大家帮忙看一下吧
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |
