ChaseDream

标题: 请教(6) [打印本页]

作者: caterpillar    时间: 2004-8-30 00:39
标题: 请教(6)

The first shots of the American Revolution, fired at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts, were, according to legend, heard around the world, but news of these shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another addtional eleven days to reach Charleston, South Carolina.


B. shots that was sent by swift messenger took four days in order to reach New York city, and also another eleven days.


C. shots that were sent by swift messenger took four days to reach NYC, and another eleven days


D.shots took four days by swift messenger in order to reach NYC and another eleven days in addition


E. shots took four days by swift messenger to reach NYC and another eleven days.


我选C,答案是E。


觉得E中by swift messenger的位置使得它只能修饰前面的four days,而后面的another eleven days好象就不是by swift messenger来完成的了。


作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-30 00:49

caterpillar Mm,介意问一下,你咋这多所谓真题,呵呵


想你看到了,为了你一个所谓真题2,我们讨论到了第6版,还没个结论


是你考试时,抄下的真题?要是真题,就不用担心题目本身的问题了,比方真题2


作者: LES    时间: 2004-8-30 00:55
caterpillar mm, 偶也很想知道这些题是不是最新的真题啊?谢谢!
作者: LES    时间: 2004-8-30 01:06
以下是引用caterpillar在2004-8-30 0:39:00的发言:

The first shots of the American Revolution, fired at Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts, were, according to legend, heard around the world, but news of these shots, which were sent by swift messenger, took four days in reaching New York City as well as another addtional eleven days to reach Charleston, South Carolina.


B. shots that was sent by swift messenger took four days in order to reach New York city, and also another eleven days.


C. shots that were sent by swift messenger took four days to reach NYC, and another eleven days


D.shots took four days by swift messenger in order to reach NYC and another eleven days in addition


E. shots took four days by swift messenger to reach NYC and another eleven days.


我选C,答案是E。


觉得E中by swift messenger的位置使得它只能修饰前面的four days,而后面的another eleven days好象就不是by swift messenger来完成的了。



mm,怎么会这么想呢?这种用法很常见啊?后面不用by swift messenger是省略了更简洁。


C有两个问题,1. 逻辑错误,that 从句应该是修饰news,但是由于从句中谓语用了were所以变成修饰shots了,news虽然是复数形式,但是作为“新闻”来讲,它是不可数的。


2. but连词后面没有句子,造成所谓的"run-on"句子。


作者: lucre    时间: 2004-8-30 01:33

e


news were 错


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-30 1:36:10编辑过]

作者: caterpillar    时间: 2004-8-30 05:35
我也不知道是不是真题,朋友买来的,很凌乱,大部分是GWD,但排序又不同。现在我是挑了跟GWD不同的几道来跟大家讨论一下。最可恨的是只有纸件,为了这几道题打了我老半天。:)
作者: caterpillar    时间: 2004-8-30 05:37
以下是引用LES在2004-8-30 1:06:00的发言:



mm,怎么会这么想呢?这种用法很常见啊?后面不用by swift messenger是省略了更简洁。


C有两个问题,1. 逻辑错误,that 从句应该是修饰news,但是由于从句中谓语用了were所以变成修饰shots了,news虽然是复数形式,但是作为“新闻”来讲,它是不可数的。


MM说得对,我没注意到这个!


2. but连词后面没有句子,造成所谓的"run-on"句子。

这个倒不是run-on吧,谓语仍然是took啊?不过第一点已经错了,肯定不能选C了。谢谢!



作者: LES    时间: 2004-8-30 15:59
以下是引用caterpillar在2004-8-30 5:35:00的发言:
我也不知道是不是真题,朋友买来的,很凌乱,大部分是GWD,但排序又不同。现在我是挑了跟GWD不同的几道来跟大家讨论一下。最可恨的是只有纸件,为了这几道题打了我老半天。:)

辛苦mm了!同时谢谢分享!

为了使讨论有意义,烦请mm打完题目,务必多确认一下打字正确。谢谢!


作者: 流沙    时间: 2004-8-30 16:48
以下是引用LES在2004-8-30 1:06:00的发言:



mm,怎么会这么想呢?这种用法很常见啊?后面不用by swift messenger是省略了更简洁。


C有两个问题,1. 逻辑错误,that 从句应该是修饰news,但是由于从句中谓语用了were所以变成修饰shots了,news虽然是复数形式,但是作为“新闻”来讲,它是不可数的。


2. but连词后面没有句子,造成所谓的"run-on"句子。


哪里有but?






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3