ChaseDream

标题: 请问og73题 b选项 would 为何不好,应该换成should [打印本页]

作者: hedayong 时间: 2004-8-29 23:55
标题: 请问og73题 b选项 would 为何不好,应该换成should

og:the if clause in B must take should rather than would 为什么？

73. The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.

(A) how they would have to act militarily to deal with them

(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary

(C)what would be necessary militarily for dealing with such an event

(D) what military action would be necessary in order to deal with such an event

(E) the necessity of what kind of military action in order to take for dealing with it

In choices A and B, the pronoun them has no antecedent; furthermore, the if clause in B must take should rather than would (虚拟语气). In C, necessary militarily is awkward and vague (不如D表达的清晰). E is wordy and garbles the meaning with incorrect word order. Choice D is best: its phrasing is clear, grammatical, and idiomatic. Moreover, D is the choice that most closely parallels the construction of the nonunderlined portion of the sentence. The sentence states that the Admiralty and the War Office met to consider x and y, where x is the noun phrase a possible Russian attempt. D provides a noun phrase, military action, that matches the structure of x more closely than do the corresponding noun elements in the other choices.

通常一个概括性的名词要比代词清晰的多（这往往成为正确答案的标志）

作者: sophie_zyy 时间: 2004-8-30 20:39

A选项中的THEY 指带不明,HAVE TO 也带有主观色彩.

B中的THEM 应该用IT

C中的NECESSARY应和TO 搭配

D中用EVENT这个新名词指带,消除了歧义.

E中的NECESSITY 不简洁,FOR也用错了,整个句子看上去很罗嗦.

作者: hedayong 时间: 2004-9-3 20:49
the if clause in B must take should rather than would 为什么？

作者: tweib 时间: 2004-9-3 22:31

为什么OG说should比would更好？

因为if 从句表达与现在事实相反时，一般用would。 OG说用should 则可避免掉这样的歧义, 又可以表达would 所要表达的意思....

即用should是为了避免　表达if从句变成表" 与现在事实相反 "的虚拟语气

作者: micht 时间: 2004-12-28 06:14

關於B選項為何if要接should而非would..我是這麼想的

73. The British Admiralty and the War Office met in March 1892 to consider a possible Russian attempt to seize Constantinople and how they would have to act militarily to deal with them.

(B) how to deal with them if military action would be necessary

我覺得比在作抉擇 whether to take military action or not.
而不是作假設 if they should take military action?

因為後面有"be necessary" 需要? or 不需要? take military action or not?

請nn確認 thank you

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-28 6:22:55编辑过]

作者: titatita 时间: 2005-11-9 20:43
ding,我也想明确一下为什么should比would好

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)