ChaseDream

标题: 逻辑JJ61求助 [打印本页]

作者: 蘑菇胖肉肉 时间: 2012-2-21 11:03
标题: 逻辑JJ61求助
Whiplash injuries- GWD
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious:clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is that conclusion.

B. The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes; the second is the position that the argument defends.

C. The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is the position that the argument defends.

D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument defends; the second is the position that the argument opposes.

E. The first presents a claim that is disputed in the argument; the second is a conclusion that has been drawn on the basis of that claim.

答案是A

为什么C不对呢？

作者: 蛋蛋音 时间: 2012-2-21 12:22
however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious

作者已经说了是wrong to draw了嘛，怎么会position that the argument defends，明显应该是criticize呀。
第一个BD是用来support这个conclusion的.

作者: 蘑菇胖肉肉 时间: 2012-2-21 12:36

however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious

作者已经说了是wrong to draw了嘛，怎么会position that the argument defends，明显应该是criticize呀。
第一个BD是用来support这个conclusion的.

-- by 会员蛋蛋音 (2012/2/21 12:22:47)

。。。我脑残了。。。谢啦~~~~~

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)