ChaseDream

标题: 求问，OG12 CR91题 [打印本页]

作者: 风鸣蝉 时间: 2012-2-18 18:55
标题: 求问，OG12 CR91题
Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.

The environmentalist’s statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?

(A) The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of people on nature.

(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered resource.

这道题答案是E，为什么不选A？
E说鱼依然是濒危资源，但是文中只说根据捕鱼数量上涨说明鱼不濒危是错的，但是并没有说鱼是否依然濒危啊。
望各位大神不吝赐教，多谢

作者: alandiyer 时间: 2012-2-19 01:55
E is the paraphase of the conclusion of the passage.
This is a specious , ...... that deplete resources.

作者: sunnylinmy 时间: 2012-2-19 17:39
后面不是有解释咩?
A. Although the environmentalist claims that technology causes people's greater encroachment on nature in this single instance, there is nothing in the argument to suggest that such encroachment caused by technology is a general trend.
A的意思是人类不断侵占自然的原因之一是用了科技.(翻译的不好..将就吧)
OG的解释是说不能从鱼这一个例子中推广这个说法..

对于楼主关于E的解释吧..我觉得哈..题干拿鱼和热带雨林做类比,然后一个deplete可以解释濒危的问题吧...

作者: miffyflysky 时间: 2012-10-4 21:28

后面不是有解释咩?
A. Although the environmentalist claims that technology causes people's greater encroachment on nature in this single instance, there is nothing in the argument to suggest that such encroachment caused by technology is a general trend.
A的意思是人类不断侵占自然的原因之一是用了科技.(翻译的不好..将就吧)
OG的解释是说不能从鱼这一个例子中推广这个说法..

对于楼主关于E的解释吧..我觉得哈..题干拿鱼和热带雨林做类比,然后一个deplete可以解释濒危的问题吧...

-- by 会员 sunnylinmy (2012/2/19 17:39:28)

豁然开朗呀。谢谢啦

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)