Question:
`Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A 'flat' organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.~
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
********************
Your Answer:
Should corporations and other business eliminate the many ranks and salary grades, as the speaker contends? I strongly disagree with this recommendation. While I concede a hierarchical structure is not as flexible as a flat one, hierarchical structure is much more likely to help the corporations enhance their productivities.
First of all, it does not accord with human nature to eliminate the ranks between employees. On the contrary, it is the hierarchical structure that render an organization more stable and under control. Different people from time to time have different opinions, which often occur in the business world. If there is not a clear authority hierarchical structure, people tend to perform according to their own belief. As a result such organization lacks the uniformity, thereby slipping into a state of chaos. Obviousl, the speaker's statement that " a flat structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and corporation among employees" is not convincing at all。
Moreover, such ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise serve as an incentive which drive the employees to perform better. Common sense tells us everyone want his status raised. Provided such criteria of promotion can be made properly as the basis of one's performance, it surely can encourage people to act as what the organization requires. Therefore, the goal of the organization can be successfully fulfilled.
Admittedly, some of my contenders may point out that a hierarchical structure probably have(has) the disadvantage of a costly staff and slow reaction. However, if we considering both the detrimental effects that a flat organization bring about as described above and the positive results a proper hierarchical structure can give us such as specialization of tasks, rationalization of activities and catalyst to the performance of employees, the final decision is obvious that a hierarchical structure can contribute more to the success of an organization.
In sum, because of the above-mentioned reasons, which probably interweave into an organic whole and become more compelling, we can safely reach the conclusion that in the business world, a hierarchical structure is more suitable to the organization than is a flat one.
时间很紧，结尾有点草率，括号内使改正的错误，大概有几分阿？
楼主这个问题太tough 了吧？ 偶们不是ETS呀。
不过大概看了一遍，感觉还是不错的。
祝考试顺利。 AWA6.0
谢谢brony大哥的指导，还有不到一个星期就要考了，ai写了十篇，摸版基本上确定了，aa写了三四篇，所有的逻辑错误都覆盖到了一遍。接下来最需要做点什么呢？是不是要把黄金八十题的提纲准备一下？所有ai,aa的题目需不需要全看一遍。
其实最头痛的是我的打字问题，字母顺序老是颠倒。
AI的摸板最好能够准备些变体，以免到时候想换种说法说不出来。AA就是把那些逻辑错误的论证方法记熟。
最好把所有题目看一下，至少看懂，省得到时候再想。提纲的话可以按照topic的分类来准备。
祝考试顺利！AWA满分！
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |