ChaseDream

标题: lsat-18-4-22 [打印本页]

作者: ztlbox 时间: 2004-8-25 06:56
标题: lsat-18-4-22

22. George: The economics taught in college is very confusing-and that's because it's all wrong. Harold: If it's all wrong, why is college economics still force-fed to students? George: It's very difficult to learn something that's all wrong, and if, by chance, someone does waste all that time and learn it, he or she will be inclined to defend it ferociously and pass it on to others.

Which one of the following, if true, would most directly challenge George's reasoning?

(A) Many college graduates who have taken economics go on to successful careers in a variety of other fields.

(B) College students who major in economics tend to earn higher grades in economics than in their other subjects.

(D) Many economics professors agree with journal articles that strongly criticize college economics.

(E) Interviews five years after graduation show that economics majors are just as likely to say that their college experience was enjoyable as are those who did not major in economics.

the answer is D, is it correct?

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-8-26 05:10
标题: lsat-18-4-22
直接WEAKEN结论型。结论：人们学某东西，就会为它辩护。D很多经济学教授并没为经济学辩护。

作者: Bensontuo 时间: 2019-8-1 13:44

ztlbox 发表于 2004-8-25 06:56
22. George: The economics taught in college is very confusing-and that's because it's all wrong. Har ...

Because Econ is all wrong, so its very confusing.

Difficult to learn ---> All wrong

If learn it, inclined to defend and pass it.

A. Not relevant to the argument.

B. Not relevant to the argument

C. Not relevant to the argument

D.Original : " If a person is a econ profs, that person must learn econ, if he learns econ, he would be inclined to defend and to pass to the others. " However, D said, they strongly criticize econ. Weaken it.

E. Not relevant to the argument

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)