标题: ISSUE 一篇 6天之后考 [打印本页] 作者: pswpswpsw 时间: 2012-2-12 15:07 标题: ISSUE 一篇 6天之后考 Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. Q2: 建议利弊型
Should governments place few, if any, restriction on scientific research and development? The speaker claims so. However I propose that there should be to some extent limit on the scientific research in some situation, sometimes we should not limit the freedom of scientific research.
I admit that, without restriction, development of some field of science is extremely harmful. Because the power of outcome of some research is so unpredictable, if it is not used in the safe way, catastrophe will likely come to us. For example, the nuclear research proved to be the paradigm of the pernicious side of science.Even when Einstein felt regret for the invention of nuclear weapon, not only a single letter had been post to the president of United States, which revealed the strong recommendation of Einstein for prevention of the usage of nuclear weapon. However, the government didn't take these remonstration into consideration about restriction.So, when the nuclear bomb was finally thrown on Japan, nearly two million people died because of its deadly radiation and even more people from several generations around this places suffered from the effect of mutation of gene, which made their children inherently disabled. Could suchresearch be supported by government? What kind of result would be if nuclear research was further progressed without the interference from government? Perhaps a little mistake on such developed experiment could destroy half of the planet. Hence, these dangerous research obviously should be restricted.
However, in the most times, development of science is of great importance to the convenience to ourdaily life. It is our way to take a insight into nature, and to make use of it to bring light to life. Indeed, the beneficial side of the development of science has witnessed by the last two centuries.The revolution of industry and the revolution of information, which produced the most profit field in the world-the Internet technology, have a dramatical impact on our daily life. Without the revolution of industry, perhaps we won't be able to go to school from suburb,and won't be able to read news just in front of the TV. Without the latter revolution, we cannot type writing on a keyboard, and cannot contact my family from another country by ICQ. Thus, under this situation above, the development of science is beneficial to our life. If restricted, what a great loss would come to us?
Moreover, development of science on some other parts is also beneficial to us onhealth.Development of modern medicine has progressed to make human life longer.,and less sickness.According to a survey, compared with last century the average of human on the planet has increased proportional to the development of medicine, which shows a significant influence on the beneficial side of development of science. Thus, the development shields human from disease. Nevertheless, these benefit would all be diminished if we take restrictions on them.
In conclusion, restrictions placed on scientific research should be considered carefully on different possible outcome. Anyway, the seeming sin of science is caused by the virulentpurpose of people who use it.Restriction should be considered differently and scrupulously on certain condition, otherwisewe may impede the development of science and lead to slowdown success in our future or maybe incur a great lossin ourselves.
蓝色的代表每段的主题句。 作者: 普渡哥 时间: 2012-2-12 15:20
这篇文章写得特别好，逻辑很清晰，英文表达很贴切。作者可以这几天再读读满分作文，记住，一定要抓住逻辑，不然写得再好耶没有用。这篇很好！作者: lukebrehm 时间: 2012-2-12 23:03
1. I admit that, without restriction(s), development of some field(s) of science is (can be) extremely harmful. 2. not only a single letter had been post to the president of United States, which revealed the strong recommendation of Einstein for prevention of the usage of nuclear weapon. (--don't get it...) 3. more people from (for) several generations around this (these) places suffered from the effect of mutation of gene (gene mutations), 4. be supported by >the< government? 5. What kind of result would >there< be if 6. progressed without the (omit, THE) interference from government? 7. Perhaps a little mistake on such (replace SUCH with A VERY) developed experiment could destroy half of the planet.
1 已经发到综合区了作者: franciszmy 时间: 2012-2-21 21:26
整体不错，第一段说一些研究不加限制就不好。那么，后两段上来说一下大多数研究限制不好，这样逻辑会更清楚一点，当然楼主这么写也没问题作者: jameszhm 时间: 2012-2-23 00:18
楼主 有时间可以考虑加入我们每周三拍~作者: jurat911 时间: 2012-2-26 15:04
very impressive except some sort of spelling mistake. good for you
