标题: 新PREP114 [打印本页] 作者: AgencyWan 时间: 2012-2-11 23:04 标题: 新PREP114 Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? A. The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area. B. There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native. C. No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city. D. All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species. E. There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empire were familiar. 我做的时候排除了 ABCD选了E, 但是还是不是很理解为什么E对, 请大家解答下.作者: 期期啦啦 时间: 2012-3-20 14:05
否定E，就变成：有一个罗马不同地区的工匠都熟悉的共通的design模式，那么就不需要外来工匠完成了，本地工匠也可以做，即使本地没有这种动物，削弱了结论。反过来肯定E，就是加强。