GWD8用基本工具--文本选择工具HIGHLIGHT后复制按钮是灰色的，不能复制，求助。
就是油画的那题，为什么B不行(under current standard)？
多谢。
Q22:
When storing Renaissance oil paintings, museums conform to standards that call for
careful control of the surrounding temperature and humidity, with variations confined
within narrow margins. Maintaining this environment is very costly, and recent research
shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and
humidity. Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without
endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Renaissance paintings were created in conditions involving far greater
fluctuations in temperature and humidity than those permitted by current
standards.
B. Under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil
paintings, those paintings do not deteriorate at all.
C. Museum collections typically do not contain items that are more likely to be
vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil
paintings.
D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are
vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to
cause damage to the paintings.
E. Most Renaissance oil paintings are stored in museums located in regions near the
regions where the paintings were created.
多谢麻哥，链接在此，方便看到本贴又有同样问题的G友
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=22&ID=65894
同时，麻哥对本题发表点意见拉
I think the answer is C;
B can not undermine the reasoning of the passage.
recent research
shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and
humidity (evidence).Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without
endangering their Renaissance oil paintings(conclusion).
So whatever B is true or not, it can not break the fact (old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity).
C points out no other items will be affected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity, so it's the assumption.
humidity
谢谢LEEON
GWD8的答案给的是D(B)，说明作者倾向于D，但没有完全排除B
之前没有人问这题，大家对这一有争议的问题怎么看呢？
多多讨论
I think the answer is C;
B can not undermine the reasoning of the passage.
recent research
shows that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and
humidity (evidence).Therefore, museums could relax their standards and save money without
endangering their Renaissance oil paintings(conclusion).
So whatever B is true or not, it can not break the fact (old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity).
C points out no other items will be affected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity, so it's the assumption.
humidity
这个题目是问support啊，不是undermine
I read the passage again,I will change my answer to D;
C eliminate other items can cause the conclusion looks like the correct answer, in fact, it's not, C compares items( that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity) with Renaissance oil paintings, but the passage said even old oil paint was unaffected by..., it did not say Renaissance oil paintings were affected or not,even if it said Renaissance oil paintings are unaffected, C also would not be the correct answer, in that if other items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings exist, they (other items) also could be unaffected by....
B is not the answer, B said those paintings do not deteriorate at all, there is some defferent between deteriorate at all and affected. So B is not a necessary condition.
I'm puzzled by the word 'enough' and eliminated it at first glance. This is a difficult question.
Answer is D.
B does not have to be true for this question. If the painting deteriorate somewhat with the standards, the standards can still be relaxed if the relaxation does not affect the restoration. I do not know why you choose B. Pls explain.
C is not correct either. It is clearly out of scope. We are talking about restoring this particular type of painting and the standards as well as the change are both for this kind of painting. Whether the museum has other kind of items is irrelevent. Please make sure you understand.
D is one typical answer. It simply points out that it might not be the oil that requires the standard, but something else.
B does not have to be true for this question. If the painting deteriorate somewhat with the standards, the standards can still be relaxed if the relaxation does not affect the restoration. I do not know why you choose B. Pls explain.
thanks mindfree
the reason i originally chose B is:
the line of reasoning in the stem is since even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity, museums could relax their standards and save money without endangering their Renaissance oil paintings.
so, if, we negate B, under the current standards that museums use when storing Renaissance oil paintings, those paintings already deteriorate, it'll be unreasonable to relax the standards.
pls correct me.
mindfree:
after scrutinizing the stem several times, I think I might grasp two elements of key points. that is, Renaissance oil paintings and standards about fluctuations in temperature and humidity, and the fact presented in the stem that even old oil paint is unaffected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity is unshakable, so B and C should be out of scope.
In B, those paintings deteriorate perhaps due to some reasons other than fluctuations in temperature and humidity.
In C, some items might be hurt which are unrelated to Renaissance oil paintings.
right?
To Tony6:
The deteriorating is out of scope. Within the given reasoning, even if the paiting deteriorates badly with the standard, the argument still holds. Just assume that it is the best approach and the same effect can be achieved without the standard.
To Leeon:
It is better with "enough" as it makes it clear that damage done without the standard will make a difference. It simply rules out the possibility that some negligible/unnoticeable damages will be done wihout the standard. In such case, D is not a strong answer any more.
后来我仔细看了下
认为是D
不过D里欠了个字，the paint该是the old paint
是打错了还是我错了？
再请nn帮忙，还是没看懂选项D：
None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity to cause damage to the paintings.
题目中已经隐含the old oil paint比文艺复兴式的paint更容易affected by wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity，D中是说materials other than the paint(指文艺复兴时的paint) are not vulnerable enough to relatively wide fluctuations in temperature and humidity 取非为削弱，排除了materials cause damage的可能性
请指正
我再顶
我再顶
Answer is D.
B does not have to be true for this question. If the painting deteriorate somewhat with the standards, the standards can still be relaxed if the relaxation does not affect the restoration. I do not know why you choose B. Pls explain.
C is not correct either. It is clearly out of scope. We are talking about restoring this particular type of painting and the standards as well as the change are both for this kind of painting. Whether the museum has other kind of items is irrelevent. Please make sure you understand.
D is one typical answer. It simply points out that it might not be the oil that requires the standard, but something else.
mindfree不是说了么，B的条件太强；即使有一点影响还是可以接受的，因为这不是省钱么（按原文的逻辑 very costly）
LOR:因为实验发现old paint不会受温度湿度影响，所以relax the standard 不会影响old painting。问假设。
因此，C中的items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings. 无关
D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are...
取非 = SOME of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are...
既然油画上的paint不会受温度湿度影响（因为实验证明old paint如何如何），而且D说其他冬冬也不会受影响而破坏油画，这不就全了么。
首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画，paint油漆
choice B: 狡猾的无关选项。 文章结构：old paint is unaffected by wide fluctuation => relaxing standards without endangering paintings.
B说：在现在的条件下，paintings do not deteriorate at all. 取非：If paintings did deteriorate a little, 只要不是使paintings endangered, relaxing standards is ok.
C. 无关。文章重点讨论如何保存oil paintings. 如果文章说的是保存oil paintings 和别的艺术品， 那么可以考虑C
D. 除paints以外的成分，不会因为wide fluctuation而损坏paintings. (典型ETS答案：它因不导致B).
首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画，paint油漆
choice B: 狡猾的无关选项。 文章结构：old paint is unaffected by wide fluctuation => relaxing standards without endangering paintings.
B说：在现在的条件下，paintings do not deteriorate at all. 取非：If paintings did deteriorate a little, 只要不是使paintings endangered, relaxing standards is ok.
C. 无关。文章重点讨论如何保存oil paintings. 如果文章说的是保存oil paintings 和别的艺术品， 那么可以考虑C
D. 除paints以外的成分，不会因为wide fluctuation而损坏paintings. (典型ETS答案：它因不导致B).
首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画，paint油漆
哦开始就把文章中的油漆看成油画了。em12
所以肯定是d 油漆可以不用恒温恒湿， 不能得出油画也可以， 如果油画包含其他怕改变的温湿的成分， 也不行的
mindfree, lawyer_1看他们的解释，真能让人豁然开朗。
就像当年读Linux的源程序
首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画，paint油漆
choice B: 狡猾的无关选项。
文章结构：old paint is unaffected by wide fluctuation => relaxing standards without endangering paintings.
B说：在现在的条件下，paintings do not deteriorate at all. 取非：If paintings did deteriorate a little, 只要不是使paintings endangered, relaxing standards is ok.
C. 无关。文章重点讨论如何保存oil paintings. 如果文章说的是保存oil paintings 和别的艺术品， 那么可以考虑C
D. 除paints以外的成分，不会因为wide fluctuation而损坏paintings. (典型ETS答案：它因不导致B).
这个解释太关键了！！！
其实我就是开始根本没分清paint和painting，才做错的！
谢谢！
我个人对“不选B”的理由的补充：
将B取非：在现有条件下，painting已经deteriorate了。
可是这又能如何呢？
没有提到，降低条件后，这种deterioration会加剧啊！！！
所以，即使已经deteriorate了，还是可以降低条件啊，反正不会进一步deteriorate了。
－－－－
各位以为如何？
原文说了，即使是old oil paint 也不会受较大的温度湿度变化的影响，所以我这个deterioration不会加重的解释也是行得通的吧？
能解释一下这篇文章不？大概意思是什么？
问题出现在争论的焦点是现在的情况下，这个情况时值在博物馆没有放松温度和适度的条件下，第2个选项不可一支持新的放松温度和适度的建议。
单词关：
painting-油画
paint: 油漆
原文说油漆不受环境影响。则假设应该是补足GAP，油画中的其他物质也不受环境影响
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |