Q14:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
答案是C, 偶选D. 哪个对? 请指教! 谢谢...
你已经先假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资高”，所以﹙D﹚会support。
若假设另一个方向” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”，那﹙D﹚不就是weaken了..
相反的，﹙C﹚提供了另一个不可或缺的因素。
故我认为应该是﹙C﹚
本题是借助文中提及的第三者达到加强的目的,D为正确答案;
M-N-L, 通过M与N, N与L的比较,给出M/L之间的关系;
嗯，怎么没有人问 gwd 6－15？
为什么选e，哪位nn给指点一下？
你已经先假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资高”，所以﹙D﹚会support。
若假设另一个方向” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”，那﹙D﹚不就是weaken了..
相反的，﹙C﹚提供了另一个不可或缺的因素。
故我认为应该是﹙C﹚
试着解释爱维的疑问。如果取消的工资比现在低，则现在的平均工资更高，因此是加强；如果取消的工资比现在高，则有可能是削弱，因为这样现在的平均工资就可能降低，D所以就正确。不知我说的对不对？
请问A为什么不行?
Q14:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
ding~~
anybody could help??
你已经先假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资高”，所以﹙D﹚会support。
若假设另一个方向” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”，那﹙D﹚不就是weaken了..
相反的，﹙C﹚提供了另一个不可或缺的因素。
故我认为应该是﹙C﹚
D正确。文章中已经说了，新增工作比平均工作工资高。D说失去的工作和平均工作工资一样。不就说明新增工作比失去的工作工资高了吗？为什么还要假设” 取消的工作也比平均工资低”呢？
请问A为什么不行?
Q14:
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?
A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
我觉得A也有道理。题干的结论是：throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger
A正好说明pay是稳步上升的－－不关是比前任上升，而是在任期内逐步上升。
请指教！
Although i choice A that seems a correct answer, finally i realize D will be better
D fill out the gap between "more jobs created than were eliminated" and "the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide"
题干给出两点支持：1。the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, 2。the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.
第二点说明了几年来平均工资逐年提高。A只提到了工资的提高，单纯重复了第二点的一部分。跟D比较，A不如D好。
支持D,关于A:
原文：市长D任期时每年新增的工作的平均工资 高于 D任期时候每年全市工作的平均工资
A（就算past three year都在市长D的任期内，则A相当于在说）：市长D任期时每年新增工作的平均工资 高于 市长D任期前新增工作的平均工资
1, 由于D任期前的新增工作 也属于 D任期时候的工作的一部分，对于这部分的任何判断都是被原文中的全市平均工资限制死了的，不论D任期前新增工作的工资高低，它们仍然被包括进了D任期时的平均工资的计算。不论高低都可以满足（D任期时候每年全市工作的平均工资 低于 市长D任期时每年新增的工作的平均工资）。
2,A可以算作原文内容的一个补充，但是对原文的内容不起support或者weaken作用，是无关选项。
楼上的解释有深度，虽然没全看懂，但觉得够到位了，考试时有这些判断感觉想必足够了，要不然时间不允许我的说。
支持D
Lawyer解釋的非常清楚!
讚!
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement
这种问法究竟是要加强还是削弱? 我觉得CD一个是加强, 一个是削弱, 到底这里的argument是什么意思?
不好意思，问一下：A为什么不对？我脑子没转过来。
A means that the average paycheck at this tenure is higher than the last one,but the argument is that the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.so even if the average paycheck increased compared with last tenure,it cant support that the paycheck this tenure is getting bigger ,maybe at the first year of the tenure was very high,then declined .so a cant support the argument.
d嘛！
这种牵扯到数量关系的average题
某个讨论对象的数值和average的数值之间的关系
是GMAT中常考的点
解释的很彻底，明白。
注意 A The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure. Delmont执政之前3年创造的工作机会不一定高于city wide average因为我们并不知道这两者之间高低的关系 所以A不对
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |