(求助) og259-因果關係與由輕到重句型 - ChaseDream

259. Five fledgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.

答案選A我可以接受，是五個選項裡最好的一個，但我當初是AE兩個挑了A，我想請問有二

一、E 有什麼不好，如何修改可以讓他成為標準答案?A 選項是否也是簡化來的，原來又該是什麼

二、og解釋說，bring是與left同時進行的動作，這反而讓我糊塗了，本題句意該如何翻譯呢?

bring 引导的现在分词是前面整个桔子的结果，而不是five fledgling sea eagles 发起的动作。如果选E, 就变成了是five fledgling sea eagles's action. In addition, E imples the action of "bring....." occured after "five fledging sea eagles left....". This is what OG says about the two action happened simultanously.

五只什么什么孩鹰这个夏天离开了在西苏格兰的巢，使得成功喂养什么什么野生鸟达到34只。翻的不好，多多原谅。

这又是由轻到重的写作方式,老美最爱,可参阅我对OG #6解释的帖子.

“…, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.”

但是因为宾语太长,按老美习惯,会将(O.C.)提至宾语前,让句子呈现头轻脚重的方式,这是习惯,没有特别原因.

“…, bringing the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975 to 34.”

由輕到重的結構改變句型真的值得好好分析，要是突破對閱讀肯定大有幫助，下面是我對epithumia的理解，整理出幾句OG中的由輕到重句型

6. In virtually all types of tissue in every animal species, dioxin induces the production of enzymes that are the organism’s trying to metabolize, or render harmless, the chemical that is irritating it.

(E) attempt to metabolize, or render harmless, the chemical irritant(標準答案)

In virtually all types of tissue in every animal species, dioxin induces the production of enzymes that are the organism’s attempt to metabolize, or render the chemical irritant harmless.

49.The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet.

(B) doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known to orbit(標準答案)

正確寫法該是

The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, doubling the number of satellites now known to orbit the distant planet to twelve .

50. As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.

(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.（D）

A baby with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500 emerges from the darkness of the womb

因为with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500 并不是宾语的补语而是主语的修饰成分。所以不应该归类为宾语与宾补的倒装。

以下是引用juliet01192000在2006-3-18 0:26:00的发言：

强烈感谢epithumia，agk99，建议加精！：）

对于agk99的总结的og 50持保留意见，我认为不属于该类。

因为with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500 并不是宾语的补语而是主语的修饰成分。所以不应该归类为宾语与宾补的倒装。

但是如果是你这样写的话：

A baby
with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500
emerges from the darkness of the womb

好像整个句子的结构更清楚些,好像也没有错。：）

open to discuss! ：）

A baby
with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500
emerges from the darkness of the womb

好像整个句子的结构更清楚些,好像也没有错。：）

open to discuss! ：）

A baby
with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500
emerges from the darkness of the womb

好像整个句子的结构更清楚些,好像也没有错。：）

open to discuss! ：）

同意，with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500
这个不属于宾补和宾语倒装的例子。with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500 是做定语（而不是宾语补足语）的，而且要就近修饰紧挨的中心词，这么说A baby with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500 emerges from the darkness of the womb是更精确的