ChaseDream

标题: 求教，PREP2007cr2_第20题 [打印本页]

作者: ying178 时间: 2012-2-5 13:09
标题: 求教，PREP2007cr2_第20题

20.(27836-!-item-!-188;#058&003666)

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total payout on car-theft claims has been larger than the company can afford to sustain.Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way.Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing such devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation.Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first and the second are both evidence offered by the argument as support for its main conclusion.

(B) The first presents a problem a response to which the argument assesses; the second is the judgment reached by that assessment.

(C) The first is the position the argument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment the argument uses to support that position.

(D) The first is a development that the argument seeks to explain; the second is a prediction the argument makes in support of the explanation it offers.

(E) The first presents a development whose likely outcome is at issue in the argument; the second is a judgment the argument uses in support of its conclusion about that outcome.

答案为B ，不太理解the second is the judgment reached by that assessment. 不知道这个assessment究竟是什么？

作者: 韩啸0508 时间: 2012-2-9 22:28
这个assessment就是Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way。作者assess这个公司不能减少政策，所以它无法因这种政策带来的payouts

作者: ying178 时间: 2012-2-10 10:45
谢谢，隔几天之后再看，觉得Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way是一个problem，而argument整体是来评估解决这一问题的一种方法的（给装防盗器的用户打折），第二个黑体是评估后得出的判断——确实会减少理赔支出。不知理解的对不对？
一口气做完PREP07的CR觉得效果不是很好，思路不清楚，隔几天再看，觉得没有那么混乱了。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)