Giuseppe Alessi, a world-class chef whose life has been a search for the genuine and the delicious in Florentine cooking, is an accomplished scholar not only unearthing many of his recipes from medieval and Renaissance manuscripts but also a poet and philosopher who draws
his inspiration from the idyllic frescoes of Etruscan tombs.A. not only unearthing many of his recipes from medieval and Renaissance manuscripts but also a poet and philosopher who drawsB. unearthing many of his recipes both from medieval and Renaissance manuscripts, as well as a poet and a philosopher who draws
C. who unearths many of his recipes from medieval and Renaissance manuscripts, as well as a poet and a philosopher who drawsD. who unearths many of his recipes from medieval and Renaissance manuscripts, but also a poet and a philosopher drawing
E. unearths many of his recipes from medieval and Renaissance manuscripts, a poet and philosopher drawing
正确选项C,我错选D,我的问题:
1. Not only...but also是递进关系,后者更重要;as well as是后者附属,相当于改变的原文的逻辑关系,为什么C对?
亲,是不是看错了?这题not only是划线部分,就说C/D 根本不存在not only
2. 形容人的头衔用"a A and B" OR "a A and a B"?
好问题啊~~我也不知道...本着“外事不决问google"的原则,我开始以下求证:搜索"is a scientist and an artist" About 165,000 results搜索"is an artist and a scientist" About 122,000 results搜索"is a scientist and artist" About 1,170,000 results搜索"is an artist and scientist" About 467,000 results大致confirm了一下信息的可靠,扫一下,例句基本上都是 "Someone is ...." 正是我们想要的!搜索"is a chemist and a biologist" 4 results,只有一个满足条件——似乎不太靠谱搜索"is a biologist and a chemist" 1 result ——似乎也不太靠谱搜索"is a chemist and biologist" About 116,000 results搜索"is a biologist and chemist" About 16,600 results这后面两个,找出来的例句基本都是我们想要的。由以上实验结果,我们是否可以得出以下结论?1. 统计数据倾向于"a A and B"2. 如果A和B属于距离比较远的不同领域(例如科学与艺术),那么也可以用"a A and a B";如果A和B关系密切,则不倾向于用"a A and a B".3. CD的who draws和drawing都是修饰谁的?
drawing作为"no comma + v-ing",必须遵从touch rule 修饰preceding noun,也就是philosopher,不合逻辑(根据意思"drawing inspiration from ..." should apply to both poet and philosopher)。"who draws",这个句子的结构是:X is Y (a poet and a philosopher) who draws ....其实从语法上,认为who draws修饰philosopher,或者认为修饰X(=Y),都grammatical从逻辑上,应该修饰X(=Y)所以就是修饰X(=Y),也就是主语GA4. D怎么错了?
最大错误是but also单独出现....其他(诸如drawing)算是inferior吧谢谢亲们!

-- by 会员 miss绿光 (2012/2/2 20:38:58)