Q20:
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
答案E。这题没有人问,大家都没有问题吗?做的时候我也选了E,但搞不懂句子的结构,划线部分与未划线部分如何连接的呢?请教。
Q20:
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
句子主干是:The first trenches have yielded strong evidence.
evidence 后面的that。。是一个同位语结构。
答案E。这题没有人问,大家都没有问题吗?做的时候我也选了E,但搞不懂句子的结构,划线部分与未划线部分如何连接的呢?请教。
谢谢LEEON和ROBERTA。
这种动词分别跟两个介词的方式,虽然不是第一次见到,96年12月北美TOEFL阅读中还有2、3个介词连用的情况:
what we today call America folk arts was, indeed, art of, by, and for ordinary, everyday "folks" who, with increasing prosperity and leisure, created a market for art of all kinds, and especially for portaits.
但是本句中这样用, 介词的搭配没有问题吗?
我查了LONGMAN,arise 只有跟介词from和out of的用法,没有本句中的with和of的用法。请教。
可是,为什么要用完成时have yielded 呢?
I choose c,
why is c wrong?
why A is wrong, please?
A. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
...societies that were arising (simultaneously with but independently of) ...city-states....
C & D omitted 'with', making the sentence unclear.
我也选了A,但是现在看看觉得evidence后面的话用短语来说实在太长了,而且不通,middle east后面的that从句有修饰不准确的嫌疑。
而且GMAT里涉及到evidence的话一般都是用that从句(LZM里好象有说过),
A有两个不足。
1、that were,是可要可不要的,E选项里出现了不要that were的形式,那就这点而言,E更佳。
2、evidence后面用that从句修饰是最好的。A的方式显然不好。还是E更佳。
不明白这里为什么要用with
Up!
两个问题未解
1.为什么用完成式,这题一看到就先把完成式全删了
2.arise with…,with的作用
Up!
两个问题未解
1.为什么用完成式,这题一看到就先把完成式全删了
2.arise with…,with的作用
1 通过trenches产生了一个有力的证据,用现在完成时在逻辑上是没有问题的,而使用的一般现在时的B,D选项,都错误地用“Yields”和trenches搭配,自然就被排除掉了
2 with是指中东北部地区的复杂的社会,是与"city-states"一同出现的,所以是arise simultaneously with city-states
A有两个不足。
1、that were,是可要可不要的,E选项里出现了不要that were的形式,那就这点而言,E更佳。
2、evidence后面用that从句修饰是最好的。A的方式显然不好。还是E更佳。
其实这句话不难理解:
主要是强调这个society的两个特性:arise simultaneously with the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, but arise independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia。也就是说,它的产生是和后者同时,但是并无相互关系。
我依然不明白为什么用"have yielded--------",请指教
谢谢LEEON和ROBERTA。
这种动词分别跟两个介词的方式,虽然不是第一次见到,96年12月北美TOEFL阅读中还有2、3个介词连用的情况:
what we today call America folk arts was, indeed, art of, by, and for ordinary, everyday "folks" who, with increasing prosperity and leisure, created a market for art of all kinds, and especially for portaits.
但是本句中这样用, 介词的搭配没有问题吗?
我查了LONGMAN,arise 只有跟介词from和out of的用法,没有本句中的with和of的用法。请教。
这里的搭配不是arise with 和arise of ,而是simultaneously with 和independently of.
在做题的时候,并列关系是优先考虑项,所以看到but 以及but 后面跟的independently of,我们就应该想到,but 前面要出现一个副词再加上一个介词的形式,根本不用考虑太多.
这是我的理解,希望大家讨论
可是,为什么要用完成时have yielded 呢?
本题的四个选项中,谓语动词有两种:have yielded 和yields.因为句子的主语中心语是trenches, 所以肯定要用have yielded 了.要根据题目解题,而不是根据我们自己的语法知识解题.
美林说得没错,这里arising后没跟任何宾语或介词。simultaneously with 和 independently of 都是用来比较 centrally administered complex societies 和 the more celebrated city-states。
A) would have been right if "were arising" is replaced by "arose", right?
I think I know exactly why A) is wrong.
For A). the sentense can be simplified as:
Trenches have yielded evidence for societies.
But this is meaningless; what the author really wants to state is:
Trenches have yielded evidence that societies arouse ....
following is my thought :
first of all , A and B is wrong since they both not concise , use that that ..... to modify instead of "cut"
C , not indication that cut action last till now ...
D and E , I prefer to D , because there is indeed no definite time clause to indicate needs of using passive tense.
可是,为什么要用完成时have yielded 呢?
好厉害的招数!非常人所能为也……呵呵
A:两个that were可以去掉;逻辑意思错,have yielded evidence for …societies;
B:that were可以去掉;yields错;were arising时态不准确
C:having been得去掉;were arising时态不准确;simultaneously后面少一个with或者其他
D:yields错;evidence后改成从句更好;少一个with
E:正确
这里的搭配不是arise with 和arise of ,而是simultaneously with 和independently of.
不敢苟同,副词与介词连用是什么语法?
发错帖子了~
因该是phrase 的用法, 而不是副词介词连用吧? 要不就像有个人说的, 看平衡就好, 别想太深
arose simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
(社会)和那些著名的美索不达米亚南部的城邦同时但独立地兴起,也就是在现在伊拉克南部。
翻译出来就知道为什么是e了
那with是这么回事呀,是arose后的介词吗?
这种用法是什么意思呀?
i think trenches may yield evidence for complex societies, not "societies arose simultaneously..."
besides, i don't think there's any error in choice A
我但是用with就排除了很多选项,后来看句子结构只能选择E
看longman解释:
things that are simultaneous happen at exactly the same time
They grabbed each other's hands in simultaneous panic. Up to twenty users can have simultaneous access to the system.
simultaneous with
The withdrawal of British troops should be simultaneous with that of US forces.
The speeches will be broadcast live, with simultaneous translation (=immediate translation, as the person is speaking) into English.
ᅳsimultaneously adverb The opera will be broadcast simultaneously on television and radio.
我觉得A错在evidence for和were arising上
evidence后面应该是对evidence的详细说明,而A里面的for变成了对centrally administered complex societies的证据了,逻辑意思不对。
再者这里也没必要用过去进行式,正在产生,没有时态上同时进行的对象呀,过去式就好了。
请问NN们:A与E 不同于 E比 A 更简洁吗?另外“ have yielded strong evidence for 。。。。societies”这种表达错吗?
请问NN们:A与E 不同于 E比 A 更简洁吗?另外“ have yielded strong evidence for 。。。。societies”这种表达错吗?
A错在evidence for,用that从句来限定是最好的,一般后面这个evidence的具体内容是这么长的就直接可以判断用that了,短的话可以用of,当然也要看of之后是不是phrase
哦,明……
A有两个不足。
1、that were,是可要可不要的,E选项里出现了不要that were的形式,那就这点而言,E更佳。
2、evidence后面用that从句修饰是最好的。A的方式显然不好。还是E更佳。
很有道理!!
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
A. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
evidence 後接that較為貼切
B. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar,
the first trenches 應用複數動詞yield, also 多餘
C. having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
having been錯誤 simultaneously後少with與 independently of對稱
D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar,
the first trenches 應用複數動詞yield, evidence 後接that較為貼切, also 多餘, simultaneously 後少with
E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
正確
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
A. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but 1. That were多余,可以去掉;2.evidience 后面的修饰语太多,
表达不清,应该改为用同位语从句来清楚地表达意思,同时用evidence for的逻辑意思错误;
B. that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also . 1.That were多余,可以去掉; 2. Trenches 与yields不搭;3. 时态不对,后面为now,则前面的yield已经完成,应该用完成时态;4. Also 多余
C. having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but 1.having been 多余,应该去掉;2. Were arising 的时态不对,应该为过去时;3. But 作为连词,
连接的两个词应该在结构上类似,则后面为independently of ,前面就应该为simultaneously +介词
D. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also 1. Yields 与前面的trenches不搭;2.evidience 后面的修饰语太多,
表达不清,应该改为用同位语从句来清楚地表达意思,同时用evidence of的逻辑意思错误;3. 时态不对,后面为now,则前面的yield已经完成,应该用完成时态;4. Also 多余
E. cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but
正确,时态对,but 作为连词的用法正确,
evidence后面用同位语从句正确清楚地表达意思。
注意:当看到but, and 等连词时,一定要注意,连词连接的两个部分要在结构上一定要平衡,
这个可以作为一定错误的点
為什麼trenches 不是用 被動呢?
為什麼不是A呢?
LS的MM,the trenches cut... 和 the trenches that were cut... 是定语的两种表达方式(分词和定语从句),不是被动的问题。
A 的错误主要在于后面 evidence for...。 for 后面的部分应该是 evidence 的内容,而并非 evidence 的修饰语,而且改动之后,将 arise 从 societies 的谓语变成 meddile east 的修饰语,改变了原意而且逻辑错误。
详细的 E 选项翻译可参见 36 楼的解释。
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |