Nonsense.
Read my post. There are two types of assumptions and the negation test only works for one of them.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/1/29 12:06:43)
追问道题
Commentator: The theory of trade retaliation states that countries closed out of any of another country’s markets should close some of their own markets to the other country in order to pressure the other country to reopen its markets. If every country acted according to this theory, no country would trade with any other.
The commentator’s argument relies on which of the following assumptions?
(A) No country actually acts according to the theory of trade retaliation.
(B) No country should block any of its markets to foreign trade.
(C) Trade disputes should be settled by international tribunal.
(D) For any two countries, at least one has some market closed to the other.
(E) Countries close their markets to foreigners to protect domestic producers.
这道题应该如何理解？
-- by 会员 wsyzzydy (2012/1/29 17:33:29)
看了你的post，但还是觉得混淆。感觉取非看是否能削弱原题适用于大部分的题。那什么时候不用削弱呢？如何判断，是从问题里判断还是从原文中？？另外，需要填补GAP的题型也可以用取非来完成是么？？
不好意思老师，我的问题都比较弱，assumption已经困扰我一个下午了，感觉还是没有理清思路，反而越看越混乱了T T~救救我。。。
-- by 会员 wsyzzydy (2012/1/29 17:10:16)
看了你的post，但还是觉得混淆。感觉取非看是否能削弱原题适用于大部分的题。那什么时候不用削弱呢？如何判断，是从问题里判断还是从原文中？？另外，需要填补GAP的题型也可以用取非来完成是么？？
不好意思老师，我的问题都比较弱，assumption已经困扰我一个下午了，感觉还是没有理清思路，反而越看越混乱了T T~救救我。。。
-- by 会员 wsyzzydy (2012/1/29 17:10:16)
Then read them again. What are the two types of assumptions? What type of question stem is associated with each? Which method to use for each type to find the correct answer? What is a logic chain.
One afternoon is not enough to understand assumption questions. Spend more time on logic.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2012/1/29 21:58:25)
