ChaseDream

标题: og12sc 12题 [打印本页]

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-1-20 16:30
标题: og12sc 12题
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth,

(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead

(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads

(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

先通过主谓一致排除B，D，C通过时态排除，求问A比之E哪儿不对，og上说unacompanied corresponding is awkward and ambiguous，为什么不对呢，求帮助
when和if有什么区别

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-1-20 16:40
When 引导从句不能表示条件，此句摘自PREP语法笔记。
OG里应该不会有此结论因为这应该属于基础语法点和单词的释义，是字典的任务。Longman中即有明确的解释：
1
at what time
When are we leaving? When did you first meet Dr Darnall? When will the work be finished? I don't know when I'll see her again.
when to do something
I'll tell you when to stop.
2
at or during the time that something happens
Leonard was nine when his father died. When the family came here from Russia, they were penniless. When he was in the airforce he flew Tornado jets.
3
after or as soon as something happens
When the meal was finished, Rachel washed up and made coffee. I'll phone you again when I get home.
4
used to mention a type of event or situation when talking about what happens on occasions of that type
When lead is added to petrol, it improves the car's performance. When mixed with water the powder forms a smooth paste. He always wears glasses except when playing football.
5
used to show which particular time or occasion you are talking about
The best moment was when Barnes scored the winning goal.There are times when I hate him. the day/time/afternoon etc when She remembered the day when Paula had first walked into her office.
6
by/since when
before or since which time
The baby is due in May, by when the new house should be finished. That was written in 1946, since when the education system has undergone great changes.
7
since when ...?
spoken used to show that you are very surprised or angry
Since when have you been interested in my feelings?
8
even though something is true
Why does she steal things when she could easily afford to buy them?
9
used to introduce a fact or statement that makes something seem surprising
When you consider that the airline handled 80 million passengers last year, the accident figures are really very small.

解释很权威，明确表示When没有条件如果的含义，只是在中文里讲“当……的时候”往往既可以表示时间也可以讲条件，此处与英文思想不同往往容易导致理解上的偏差，正如此题

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-1-20 16:42
在GMAT里IF只能表示”如果“，而且只在条件状语使用。假如要在宾语从句中表示”是否“，只能用WHETHER,不能用if。When只表示”当什么时候“（具体有时间概念），在GMAT里没有”如果“的意思。

举例：IF I WERE YOU 是绝不能表达成 WHEN I WERE YOU的
WHEN I WAS A CHILD 和IF I WERE A CHILD，前者表示时间，后者才表示”如果...“

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-1-20 17:08
unaccompany unaccommodating 不随和的unaccompanied 无伴侣的unaccomplished 未完成的 ...

... unaccompanied 无伴侣的 unaccompanied 不伴随...的 unaccomplished 未完成的 ...
unaccompanied无伴奏的 unaccompaniedluggage非随身携带的行李不随身行李 ...

短语
Unaccompanied Violin无伴奏小提琴

Unaccompanied Sonata无伴奏之奏鸣曲

UNACCOMPANIED BAGGAGE无人押运行李；非随行行李；非随身携带行李；后运行李

unaccompanied shipment非随身载运行李

unaccompanied minor非与父母同行的未成年人

unaccompanied luggage非随身携带的行李

Unaccompanied Minors无人陪伴的儿童；航站闹翻天；无人陪伴儿童；反斗敢死队

unaccompanied child无人陪伴儿童

Baggage Unaccompanied陪伴行李；无人陪伴行李

not accompanied

网络释义短语
Not Accompanied不相伴

Not Accompanied By Documentation没有附带文档

not accompany 比 unaccompany好

作者: babybearmm 时间: 2012-1-20 17:14
赞ls，很透彻啊~

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-1-20 17:34

赞ls，很透彻啊~

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/1/20 17:14:08)

O(∩_∩)O~前两个点是搜以前的帖子找到的前辈的话，然后第三个是自己词典找的，不过还是有个疑问，unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous?

作者: babybearmm 时间: 2012-1-20 17:52
哈，我就是看你的贴子才发现原先自己没理解unaccompanied还有这么多意思，怪不得OG说ambiguous...

你说:
unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous?

我的理解，否定的形容词后面再加副词，感觉确实有歧义
OPTION A. NOT (accompanied correspondingly) by
OPTION B. (not accompanied) CORRESPONDINGLY by
不知道我表示清楚没有，括号里是一个意群
就算OPTION A里面，NOT () 这种，也分为部分否定和全否定，是"accompanied但非correspondingly"，还是"压根就没有accompanied"？
OPTION B其实就是"非accompanied，但是这个非accompanied的状态是correspondingly"

而E. If not accompanied by corresponding ...
就很清晰

赞ls，很透彻啊~

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/1/20 17:14:08)

O(∩_∩)O~前两个点是搜以前的帖子找到的前辈的话，然后第三个是自己词典找的，不过还是有个疑问，unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous?

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/1/20 17:34:43)

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-1-20 18:14

哈，我就是看你的贴子才发现原先自己没理解unaccompanied还有这么多意思，怪不得OG说ambiguous...

你说:
unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous?

我的理解，否定的形容词后面再加副词，感觉确实有歧义
OPTION A. NOT (accompanied correspondingly) by
OPTION B. (not accompanied) CORRESPONDINGLY by
不知道我表示清楚没有，括号里是一个意群
就算OPTION A里面，NOT () 这种，也分为部分否定和全否定，是"accompanied但非correspondingly"，还是"压根就没有accompanied"？
OPTION B其实就是"非accompanied，但是这个非accompanied的状态是correspondingly"

而E. If not accompanied by corresponding ...
就很清晰

赞ls，很透彻啊~

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/1/20 17:14:08)

O(∩_∩)O~前两个点是搜以前的帖子找到的前辈的话，然后第三个是自己词典找的，不过还是有个疑问，unaccompanied correspondingly is awkward and ambiguous?

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/1/20 17:34:43)

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/1/20 17:52:49)

但unaccompanied correspondingly就已经否定accompanied，(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……你看成了 not accompanied correspondingly
以下是引用oncross在2006-7-4 4:23:00的发言：
Did MM refer to OG10-37:
37.While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.
(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course
(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course
(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately
(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required course（B）
(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately
Also, the intended meaning is distorted when the adverb separately is used to modify required, as in A and C, or taught, as in E; B correctly uses the adjective separate to modify course.现在我也混了，还是表想这么多啦，通过unaccompany和not accompany或者when和if就可以排除鸟~~抓紧总结下一题，og总结真是很费时费精力的事情，一起加油咯！！

现在我也混了，还是表想这么多啦，通过unaccompany和not accompany或者when和if就可以排除鸟~~抓紧总结下一题，og总结真是很费时费精力的事情，一起加油咯！！

作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-4-25 12:26
我是来发坏的。。。

自己查这个题目的时候本来自己对when和if的理解基本上同suri的总结，然后在BTG论坛上看到一个哥们儿的解释（还是个instructor），粘贴如下：

Great question! The difference between 'when' and 'if' is a subtle one. Indeed, in many cases the two are interchangeable. Let's have a look:
'If' and 'When' are interchangeable if the outcome is clear.
When John runs 5 miles, he sweats.
If John runs 5 miles, he sweats.
John's sweating is definite. No matter what, he will sweat if/when he runs 5 miles. Thus the outcome is clear and we can use either 'when' or 'if.'
'If' and 'When' are NOT interchangeable if the outcome is not clear. That is we are dealing with the Conditional Tense. Then we want 'if.'
It's hot outside, so John may sweat, if he runs one miles. CORRECT
It's hot outside, so John may sweat, when he runs one mile. INCORRECT
In the question above, we have an outcome that is not definite: inventories...can lead.
Therefore, we want 'if' not 'when.' Because we have inventories, (D) is incorrect (...leads).
Hope that helps .
不过我个人对以上解释持怀疑态度，个人还是比较相信原来的总结。。。

作者: babybearmm 时间: 2012-4-25 16:43
这题我找到的最好的解释：
by e-gmat http://www.beatthegmat.com/rising-inventories-t18928.html

Choice A: Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks.
To determine whether the modifier "correspondingly" is placed appropriately or not, read the sentence and ask yourself, what should correspondingly modify.

Thought process: Inventories are rising...the sentence indicates that if these rising inventories are not accompanied by increases in sales, then something happens...So rising inventories-corresponding increases in sales. Thus, corresponding should modify the increases in sales.

Now, lets check what "correspondingly" modifies - it seems to modify the verb - unaccompanied and hence the placement is not correct.

Choice D: Rising inventories, is not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads to production cutbacks.
In this sentence, correspondingly modifies increased sales. However, notice that in the original sentence, the author is talking about trends - rising inventories and increases in sales. Choice D, on the other hand, talks about trend in inventories but a specific value of sales - INCREASED sales. Thus, it does not communicate the intended meaning of the original sentence. And hence is incorrect.

作者: babybearmm 时间: 2012-4-25 16:46
我觉得这解释很赞，从corresponding的意思出发，一目了然。根本不用涉及词汇uncompanied vs. not accompanied

作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-4-25 17:27
嗯，我下午也刚刚看到这个呢

这题我找到的最好的解释：
by e-gmat http://www.beatthegmat.com/rising-inventories-t18928.html

Choice A: Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks.
To determine whether the modifier "correspondingly" is placed appropriately or not, read the sentence and ask yourself, what should correspondingly modify.

Thought process: Inventories are rising...the sentence indicates that if these rising inventories are not accompanied by increases in sales, then something happens...So rising inventories-corresponding increases in sales. Thus, corresponding should modify the increases in sales.

Now, lets check what "correspondingly" modifies - it seems to modify the verb - unaccompanied and hence the placement is not correct.

Choice D: Rising inventories, is not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads to production cutbacks.
In this sentence, correspondingly modifies increased sales. However, notice that in the original sentence, the author is talking about trends - rising inventories and increases in sales. Choice D, on the other hand, talks about trend in inventories but a specific value of sales - INCREASED sales. Thus, it does not communicate the intended meaning of the original sentence. And hence is incorrect.

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/4/25 16:43:03)

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-4-26 00:06

这题我找到的最好的解释：
by e-gmat http://www.beatthegmat.com/rising-inventories-t18928.html

Choice A: Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks.
To determine whether the modifier "correspondingly" is placed appropriately or not, read the sentence and ask yourself, what should correspondingly modify.

Thought process:Inventories are rising...the sentence indicates that if these rising inventories are not accompanied by increases in sales, then something happens...So rising inventories-corresponding increases in sales. Thus, corresponding should modify the increases in sales.

Now, lets check what "correspondingly" modifies - it seems to modify the verb - unaccompanied and hence the placement is not correct.

Choice D: Rising inventories, is not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads to production cutbacks.
In this sentence, correspondingly modifies increased sales. However, notice that in the original sentence, the author is talking about trends - rising inventories and increases in sales. Choice D, on the other hand, talks about trend in inventories but a specific value of sales - INCREASED sales. Thus, it does not communicate the intended meaning of the original sentence. And hence is incorrect.

-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/4/25 16:43:03)

顶

作者: bob9603 时间: 2012-7-2 15:59
suri亲，我看了9楼baby姐的解释，说的挺好的，但我还是有点问题~
那个correspondingly隔着by就修饰不到后面的increases in sales了吗？还是说像这些副词形容词，他们应该出现在紧跟在被修饰词的位置，不管是紧前面or紧后面？

作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-7-2 16:37
副词用于修饰形容词、副词或整个句子，这个句子中，correspondingly作为副词，紧跟着其前面的动词unaccompanied，那么很自然而然的就是修饰动词了，意思上是“没有被相应的陪伴”，而后面的increases in sales是个名词性词组，怎么可能会用副词来修饰呢

作者: wulakuka 时间: 2012-7-2 21:21
受用了~

作者: Suri在奋斗 时间: 2012-7-3 14:09

副词用于修饰形容词、副词或整个句子，这个句子中，correspondingly作为副词，紧跟着其前面的动词unaccompanied，那么很自然而然的就是修饰动词了，意思上是“没有被相应的陪伴”，而后面的increases in sales是个名词性词组，怎么可能会用副词来修饰呢

-- by 会员 zhongshanlh (2012/7/2 16:37:02)

恩啦，bob亲你看zhongshanlh说的很好啦

作者: bob9603 时间: 2012-7-8 11:48

-- by 会员 zhongshanlh (2012/7/2 16:37:02)

恩啦，bob亲你看zhongshanlh说的很好啦

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/7/3 14:09:25)

ok~~!

作者: bob9603 时间: 2012-7-8 11:53
"副词用于修饰形容词、副词或整个句子，这个句子中，correspondingly作为副词，紧跟着其前面的动词unaccompanied，那么很自然而然的就是修饰动词了，意思上是“没有被相应的陪伴”，而后面的increases in sales是个名词性词组，怎么可能会用副词来修饰呢"

是不是这样的：因为correspondingly已经修饰了前面的unaccompanied，所以就不会修饰到后面的名词词组“increases in sales”了？

作者: echo647 时间: 2012-7-10 17:17
correspoding 的意思是“相应地”，那个条件状语从句的意思是“如果没有伴随相对应的销售增长”，可以看出correspoding修饰的是后面的increases这个名词，所以放在后面。

作者: 风飘月 时间: 2013-3-15 21:59
我倒觉得这对when if的解释很精彩

我是来发坏的。。。

-- by 会员 zhongshanlh (2012/4/25 12:26:34)

作者: xunzlyx 时间: 2013-8-15 12:19

Suri在奋斗发表于 2012-1-20 16:42
在GMAT里IF只能表示”如果“，而且只在条件状语使用。假如要在宾语从句中表示”是否“，只能用WHETHER,不能 ...

when不能当如果来理解，但是when unaccompanied 可以用“当unaccompanied时候”来理解吧。我在OG和manhattan上看到了类似的用法：

OG13第63题， When Congress reconvenes, some newly elected members from rural states will try

Manhatttan Page 89，When my car is broken, I walk to the store.

Open to discuss~

作者: suapplle 时间: 2013-8-22 17:41

babybearmm 发表于 2012-4-25 16:43
这题我找到的最好的解释：by e-gmat http://www.beatthegmat.com/rising-inventories-t18928.htmlCh ...

请问一下,increased sales和increase in sales 有什么区别么？increased sales 不表示增长了的销售么?这题看了很久不是很明白，麻烦解答一下，谢谢

作者: coconutmi 时间: 2013-8-31 07:45

bob9603 发表于 2012-7-2 15:59
suri亲，我看了9楼baby姐的解释，说的挺好的，但我还是有点问题~那个correspondingly隔着by就修饰不到后面 ...

亲,貌似OG13 SC第6题就是把only放在动词和其介词by之间来修饰后面的名词。其实这也是我的一个疑问，到底如何从位置确定副词真正的修饰对象？

作者: 云游 时间: 2013-9-10 16:17
我觉得通过主谓一致以及when的排除很多地方都不到位。
有些个人看法贴在这里，大家看到了可以一起讨论讨论：

这里不能因为when的出现就直接排除A,B,C吧。没人这里一定是条件句，时间状语从句为什么就不行呢？
而且，为什么主语就一定是inventories呢？是Rising这个动作为什么就不可以呢？
我觉得这两个问题都没说清楚，个人看法：

1. When和if在大多数情况下都可以相互替换的。所谓条件句，是通过某种condition，对未知的情况进行anticipate，所以要有表示"anticipate"的词出现。这里的A,C,E中的“can”都不算是条件句的标识，只有B，有预判的含义。因此可以通过这个原则排除B。

2. 第二个关于单复数的问题，我觉得Rising（动作）和inventories谁作为核心名词是通过"accompany"的对象判断出来的。如果accompany的是increasing这个动作，leads也是没有问题。此处因为accompany的是sales所以判定核心名词是inventories.可以排除D。

3. 确定了accompany的对象之后我们也可以进而排除C，因为和inventories(库存)对应的要是sales(销售额)而不是增长。

4. 剩下A和E了，我的判读就是对unaccompanied这个词formation的把握了。我第一次以为unaccompanied这个词是unaccompany这个动词的被动形式。后来发现根本不存在unaccompany这个动词！！！ unaccompanied是从accompanied(伴随的)这个形容词变过来的，所以这是个形容词（不伴随的）。形容词之后接by显然不合理~
另外一个就是correspinding修饰的对象是increase而不是accompany.

作者: YvaineDing 时间: 2013-11-21 05:31

Suri在奋斗发表于 2012-1-20 17:08
unaccompany unaccommodating 不随和的unaccompanied 无伴侣的unaccomplished 未完成的 ... ... unaccompan ...

这里可不可以理解为unaccompanied修饰的是名词，当做形容词用比较好，当accompanied表示分词动词时，not accompanied by表示全否的意思比较好，unaccompanied往往是跟名词的，而not accompanied用作分词修饰名词？？

作者: qzawxs9876 时间: 2014-5-25 14:43

云游发表于 2013-9-10 16:17
我觉得通过主谓一致以及when的排除很多地方都不到位。
有些个人看法贴在这里，大家看到了可以一起讨论讨论 ...

‘ Rise’ is an intransitive verb. In English gramma, an intransitive verb can’t take a direct object in a sentence.
Therefore, rising invetories cannot be simple gerund and 'rising' here modifies inventories. The forms of the verb should be plural, apparently.

作者: 唐小丑 时间: 2014-7-27 15:31

qzawxs9876 发表于 2014-5-25 14:43
‘ Rise’ is an intransitive verb. In English gramma, an intransitive verb can’t take a direct ob ...

有种茅塞顿开的感觉谢谢

作者: DreamerHan 时间: 2014-10-19 03:21

zhongshanlh 发表于 2012-4-25 12:26
我是来发坏的。。。自己查这个题目的时候本来自己对when和if的理解基本上同suri的总结，然后在BTG论坛上看 ...

我认为这个观点是对的
when引导时间状语从句的含义：当某个时间点，一件事情发生，另外一件事情也发生了。但是这个后半句却是can lead，代表一种可能性，不是事实

作者: 李沐风 时间: 2014-11-1 17:13
受教了，我也是unaccompanied 和not accompanied搞不明白

作者: 中糖大人 时间: 2015-11-2 11:12

coconutmi 发表于 2013-8-31 07:45
亲,貌似OG13 SC第6题就是把only放在动词和其介词by之间来修饰后面的名词。其实这也是我的一个疑问，到底如 ...

同意！

作者: ianwyb 时间: 2016-9-18 19:38
A和E的区别
A 相应地没有销售提升
E 没有相应的销售提升
应该是库存的增加对应相应的销售提升（销售提升可以一直存在，但是不对应库存的增加量还是白搭）

作者: danieldu 时间: 2018-7-27 17:27

zhongshanlh 发表于 2012-4-25 12:26
我是来发坏的。。。自己查这个题目的时候本来自己对when和if的理解基本上同suri的总结，然后在BTG论坛上看 ...

其实这段话和Suri说的不矛盾，这段话也说When we are dealing with the Conditional Tense, we use "if",言下之意就是当需要表示条件时，只能用if，和Suri总结的when不能表条件相符

作者: 撇儿 时间: 2019-7-15 10:57

qzawxs9876 发表于 2014-5-25 14:43
‘ Rise’ is an intransitive verb. In English gramma, an intransitive verb can’t take a direct ob ...

谢谢这位解决我的问题

作者: lisa001 时间: 2019-8-8 09:49
今天才做到这题，说下我的思路，请大家指正。

总的思路是这里用条件状语从句比时间状语从句更好。

原句意是说提高库存而销售跟不上可能会削减产量从而影响经济增长。答案里可选when引导的时间状语或if引导的条件状语。这里即可以排除A、B、C三个选项，因为时间状语从句是描述某动作或事件在某时间里发生的，是必然的。而如果说的是当什么情况发生时就会有某中可能的话，条件状语从句是最优选。

再看D，possibly leads的表达没有用情态动词表达好，当然如果这里没有can lead，那possibly lead也可以，E。

我的预感没有前面几位大牛那么好，体会不到

In this sentence, correspondingly modifies increased sales. However, notice that in the original sentence, the author is talking about trends - rising inventories and increases in sales. Choice D, on the other hand, talks about trend in inventories but a specific value of sales - INCREASED sales. Thus, it does not communicate the intended meaning of the original sentence. And hence is incorrect.

复制代码

请大家指正

作者: lisa001 时间: 2019-8-8 10:04

zhongshanlh 发表于 2012-4-25 12:26
我是来发坏的。。。自己查这个题目的时候本来自己对when和if的理解基本上同suri的总结，然后在BTG论坛上看 ...

个人觉得他说的对的。时间状语从句可以理解成当...发生时就触发某事发生，是必然的，就是他说的clear outcome。但条件状语从句，可以理解为可以选择的，只有到某一条件才触发结果，这种情况下 not clear outcome，所以这时不能替换。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)