2. As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,（C）
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for
我选d
c,d都没有语法错误,
区别点：c中for表原因解释前句，yet表转折
d中用and,表和前句轻微顺序，用however表后段整体与前句整体转折
我倾向选d,原因：1、c中for these families can no longer afford to buy homes,作原因，逻辑上很牵强；d用and流畅些
2、c中的yet表转折有歧义，可以表示和主句的转折也可以表和for分句的转折，而d很好的解决了这个问题用分号隔开，分号前后两个表明两种相反的状况。
大家的意见呢？谢谢。
http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=30911
前贴，支持c的。
宝宝 这题挺难的
只能读懂句意
中产阶级影响大 原因有2
1 没钱买房
2 要多花钱租房
用D真的是逻辑不通
具体原因我也说不出来了
谢谢paopao，我明白你的意思了。
我主要被这个yet前的逗号弄昏头了。
其实这里如果象og里的“小船题”那样前面不要用逗号，句子结构会更流畅些。我现在能更好体会那题里为什么前面不用逗号了。
c的逻辑确实是很好的。谢谢paopao的解释。
我原来选D，前面并列，后面转折，但看了大家的分析，我认为的确是C：原因在于yet与however的意思的不同。however是转折，而yet是递近。指中产阶级不光买不起房，租房的负担也重了！
我也错选了D
看了楼上的解释，总算明白了
有没有讨论B,C的,science和 for都表示解释原因啊....还有,furthermore,表示递进而,yet表示转折.rising rental rates 是进一步解释families are especially hard-hit,我觉得应该是递进,而不是转折....
请问这里的yet到底应该怎么解释呢.
我也觉得yet这个词是转折，不是递进。。
在这个句子里面应表示的递进关系。。请大家再讨论
我觉得这里yet有两种词性
1 adv: in addition : besides
<gives yet another reason>. 2. con. 即连词,but同义
那么如果按以前的NN们得出的结论C对是基于yet的递进的意思,那么是否违背了副词不能连接句子的说法呢? 而如果yet做连词来讲那么有是but的意思;整个句子逻辑就不通了...
2. As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,（C）
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for
我选d
c,d都没有语法错误,
区别点：c中for表原因解释前句，yet表转折
d中用and,表和前句轻微顺序，用however表后段整体与前句整体转折
我倾向选d,原因：1、c中for these families can no longer afford to buy homes,作原因，逻辑上很牵强；d用and流畅些
2、c中的yet表转折有歧义，可以表示和主句的转折也可以表和for分句的转折，而d很好的解决了这个问题用分号隔开，分号前后两个表明两种相反的状况。
大家的意见呢？谢谢。
原句的意思是 middle-income families are especially hard-hit 的原因有2个，首先是因为他们买不起房子，and despite of this (yet在这里的意思），房租又上涨了。
D的话转折关系是弄清楚了，但是却正好弄错了
变成了middle-income families are especially hard-hit 和房租上涨的转折
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |