ChaseDream

标题: GWD12-20 [打印本页]

作者: tony6 时间: 2004-8-13 22:27
标题: GWD12-20

Q20:

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established

Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing

E的问题是不是只在于那个also?

作者: rt316 时间: 2004-8-14 01:55

A－Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

E－Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing

E的establishing造成句子没有谓语。

作者: tony6 时间: 2004-8-14 08:01

E的made不是谓语吗？

作者: tony6 时间: 2004-8-14 14:42
up

作者: memory 时间: 2004-8-14 17:54
我认为E答案主从句关系颠倒。这题答案是不是A

作者: tony6 时间: 2004-8-14 17:57

以下是引用memory在2004-8-14 17:54:00的发言：
我认为E答案主从句关系颠倒。这题答案是不是A

对，答案是A

作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-8-20 04:21
个人认为E把establishing作为伴随状语，伴随状语一般用法有两种：伴随动作或者伴随结果。这里伴随结果显然不对，这里两个动作又不一定是同时发生（虽然是同一个条案产生的动作），所以这样用不合理。

作者: davidzhn 时间: 2004-8-24 10:53
晒，受官僚机构毒害太深，我把 April 1800当成了某个带编号红头文件，结果C看起来很舒服

作者: mikeleven 时间: 2004-11-19 21:25
D主语the act, 谓语established，前面两个分词从句都作主语的修饰语。
这样看D不是最好吗?意思也对，因为原句的重心在also establish不是吗??

但我后来改变心意了。
因为如果是D或E，the act变成没有限定修饰语，又没有前后文，会让人摸不着头绪the act到底是which act?
D跟E需将the改成an才能解决这个问题。

回头看A。
主语the act of congress that blablabla...，that从句正好修饰了the act，表明了："那个blablabla的act"又(also)做了blobloblo。
完全正确。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-11-19 21:49:04编辑过]

作者: guolulu526 时间: 2004-11-27 14:52

Why b is not correct? The act, which,,,, making....., also established. 一个法令法规后面跟一个V-ING 是不ETS 最喜欢的吗?前面有位NN说WHICH 在中间有歧义,请问怎讲??

谢谢先

作者: guolulu526 时间: 2004-11-27 14:53
自己UP 以下

作者: zhouziyu 时间: 2004-11-30 20:26

我觉得选D

A: awkward

作者: gentledance 时间: 2005-4-2 04:05
小声问一下，20题中的April 24,1800前面为什么不加介词on呢？

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-6-22 20:30

这题答案支持A,但是我对于B错在哪里还是不清晰, 是不是分词和从句的并列修饰不好? 还是其它什么原因? Thanks

作者: fchn951 时间: 2005-6-23 16:32

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established making有歧义，是修饰前面的which was approved April 24, 1800,还是修饰The act of Congress，不清楚。错。
The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established approved错，应该是被动语态。法案被批准。
Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established 类似B的错误，making修饰不明确。making是修饰Approved April 24, 1800还是修饰the act of Congress? 不清楚。错。
Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing establishing用ing形式，表示伴随状态，意思改变了。意思变成了政府去新城市，这个动作建立了国会图书馆。实际上政府去新城市和建立国会图书馆是两个不同的动作和结果。

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-6-23 16:38

The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established making有歧义，是修饰前面的which was approved April 24, 1800,还是修饰The act of Congress，不清楚。错。

印象中分词在句中应该是做定语的, 这里的which结构中没有可以被限定的名词. 我觉得不是这个原因.

作者: yukon 时间: 2005-7-13 11:21

以下是引用Avantasia在2005-6-23 16:38:00的发言：

印象中分词在句中应该是做定语的, 这里的which结构中没有可以被限定的名词. 我觉得不是这个原因.

版主说说B为什么错吧。我没选B，不过只是凭感觉，B到底有什么措我也不知道，可能the act of Congress，which这种形式（A of B which，A不等于one/the one)也不是ETS所喜欢的。自己瞎总结的，NN们指教！

作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-7-13 18:05
B里面我觉得making引导的结构有夹心修饰的嫌疑, 分不清是修饰前面的congress还是后面的washington, 而且分词和被修饰对像之间加了定语从句, 从这点上说, 没有直接用定语从句来的有效, 另外B的which was approved相比直接用approved也虑嫌烦琐.

作者: wayne8888 时间: 2005-8-5 12:14
A的谓语是什么啊？established 吗？但是为什么前面还要加also呢？前面没有其他谓语并列了啊？

作者: cherrychengyue 时间: 2005-9-4 11:27

d到底哪里错了

只是觉得ETS好像不喜欢ved&ving放在一起修饰一个东西，是这个原因吗？

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-4 11:28:55编辑过]

作者: stevewu 时间: 2005-9-21 13:20

針對樓上的問題，說說偶的理解

d中的making...會有修飾歧義，不知道是修飾前面的approved...還是主語the act of Congress。如果改成 approved...and making...,就不會有這個問題。

作者: pebbles 时间: 2005-9-26 10:38

A "Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established"

这个句子很好,但是为什么主语the act of Congress和谓语also established之间有个逗号呢?这样不是fragmented sentences吗? 如果没有这个逗号, A应该是最好的.

哪位在OG中看过这种长主语和谓语之间用逗号分开的,请指点一下!

作者: scorp_w 时间: 2005-10-23 19:39

做大全的时候我发现了一条这样的规律！当一个中心词有一长一段，或两个长的修饰语，那么正确的选项是把中心词放中间，修饰分别放两边！这样引起歧义的机会小！

A和E的比较是句子重心的问题！一般来说，按原文较准确！

作者: joanrain 时间: 2005-11-1 11:17

不知道为什么，我看B特别顺眼！

好像以前也做过一道题目和这个类似，就是两个并列插入的修饰语（我语法不好，不知道该怎么表达）

A和其他选项，我都觉得不是很恰当

作者: ariesmilla 时间: 2005-11-18 18:14
A的主要動詞到底是什麼?estabished? ft...我老是把那個establish和that made...., also established...是一起的...答案看起來是A了，可是那個also讓人覺得很奇怪><

作者: julia_ggw 时间: 2005-12-6 06:37

大家在A和D之间争论得很激烈呀，我也来凑个热闹吧。

我的问题是the act应当是被approve呀，当approved April 24先于主语前置的时候为什么不用被动语态？这样不就成了the act approved而不是the act was approved了吗？

因此我支持B，除了主语和谓语离得比较远以外好像没什么别的错误呀。

请大家指点。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-6 6:39:33编辑过]

作者: urchinwang 时间: 2005-12-19 22:29

我看了好久，发现前面的时间状语才是关键。

从愿句来看，我们不可能得出那个make的动作是在1800年被approve的，最多是说1。act被在1800年被approve 2。establish这个动作被approve（其实还是有一点歧义的），但是如果如D、E那样，我们就很有理由得出make的动作是在1800年被approve的了，这根原句是完全不符的。

尽管原句自身也有歧义之嫌，但是对make这个动作还是没有歧义的，A选项保持了这点，D、E就增加了这个歧义

open to discussion!

作者: Tono 时间: 2006-1-2 10:30

请问making...如何修饰前面的which定从,实在想不通!!!!!,连逻辑主语都没有吧.我觉得只能把逻辑主语理解为the act才能讲得通啊?

B没错吧??

D中APPROVED...,MAKING....,THE ACT....按照OG的习惯和白勇的解释应该把修饰语分列修饰对象两侧,即APPROVED....,THE ACT....,MAKING....

作者: 二狼神 时间: 2006-5-17 11:54
我选D,虽然前面两个短语用AND连起来最好,但考虑到这个现在分词短语的逻辑主语可能性是唯一的,还是不会产生误解.

作者: 二狼神 时间: 2006-5-17 12:37

不同意A的意见是:虽然the act of Congress that 在修饰上没有产生对象的误解,但逻辑上产生导引:还有其他的act of Congress 在 April 24, 1800被approved了.在没有明确背景资料能提供证实的情况下,这个逻辑导引不必然为正确.这种情况下用which才能避免这种误导.

作者: gonghao 时间: 2006-5-17 12:42

【Approved April 24, 1800】, 【the act of Congress】（ that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C）., also established 看A的时候，第一眼觉的不顺眼，放在一边了，主要是逗号的关系没看清。also是副词不是连词，这是我一开始犹豫的原因
The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established －－一开始也选了B，但是发现making 不对，前面有which was approved April 24, 1800的时态标志，如果是动词的话，该用过去式形式，另外also established，证明了这一点。如果式分词做修饰语的话，我觉的前的奇怪，因为前面有了一个非限制性定语从句，后面再用分词修饰显的非常的奇怪，一般非限制性定语从句修饰完主语后跟的都是动词。如果非要做分词修饰加个and表明是修饰成分的并列不是更好吗？否则到底是动词还是修饰词呢?动词肯定不对，之前说了，分词我觉的要加and，一来表示是修饰成分的并列，二来有动作顺延的感觉，但是前面是－ed分词后面+and+－ing似乎又不好。
The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established －－－－肯定不对，名词+ed分词修饰+逗号+非限制性定语从句修饰主语+逗号+and+句子。句子+逗号+句子，但是“名词+ed分词修饰+逗号+非限制性定语从句修饰主语”没看见谓语在哪里，一堆修饰的句子都是修饰主语
Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established －－－D的解释和B关于making是分词修饰的解释差不多。我觉的1.如过是分词，应该用and连接，但是前面的是-ed，后面用ing又不好。2.可能又被理解成动词的歧异，如果是这样的话，主语应该前置，且应该是用一般过去时
Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing－－－establishing就是这个错，改成过去时就对

作者: lexie 时间: 2006-7-14 20:31

以下是引用scorp_w在2005-10-23 19:39:00的发言：

A和E的比较是句子重心的问题！一般来说，按原文较准确！

呵呵很经典哦同感

作者: lancome130 时间: 2006-7-26 17:30

答案是A。

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established （which was 是多余的）
The act of Congress approved
April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established
Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established（不知道是哪个act of congress 发出established）
Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing

其实本题的考察重点在于：that从句修饰的那个action，是实现了established这个动作的那个action，除了a选项其他选项都没有表达出这层意思，这也是我们在选答案的时候的一种说不出的语感。

作者: findjuhl 时间: 2006-9-25 23:34

答案是E，also establishing 分词做伴随的状语

A选项不够简洁，使得主谓分的太远，不够清晰明了。

请注意句意，原文这整个一句话到底是在强调the act 建立了图书馆，还是建立了一系列法规规定，做为整体的结果，建立了图书馆。建立这个动作只能由人发出，而不能是这项运动。所以also establishing做伴随的状语，逻辑主语并非句子的主语而是人。

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-12 16:05:04编辑过]

作者: MaccMichAA 时间: 2006-10-20 20:34

...

作者: MaccMichAA 时间: 2006-10-20 20:40

以下是引用findjuhl在2006-9-25 23:34:00的发言：

答案是E，also establishing 分词做伴随的状语

A选项不够简洁，使得主谓分的太远，不够清晰明了。

establishing觉得有表示动作持续进行的嫌疑句子重心意义也变化

作者: kennypl 时间: 2006-10-21 20:19

A.the act of Congress that made

这里that就近修饰congress了,似乎逻辑意思不对,我也觉得E好

NN给点意见

作者: lucyzl517 时间: 2006-10-27 02:26

以下是引用findjuhl在2006-9-25 23:34:00的发言：

答案是E，also establishing 分词做伴随的状语

A选项不够简洁，使得主谓分的太远，不够清晰明了。

晕！这位GG既然都看出来原文是强调建立图书馆的怎么还选E

作者: yaoshuming 时间: 2006-12-13 17:43

以下是引用pebbles在2005-9-26 10:38:00的发言：

A "Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established"

这个句子很好,但是为什么主语the act of Congress和谓语also established之间有个逗号呢?这样不是fragmented sentences吗? 如果没有这个逗号, A应该是最好的.

哪位在OG中看过这种长主语和谓语之间用逗号分开的,请指点一下!

顶这个问题？哪位nn来解答一些？这个逗号是我排除A选项的原因

作者: xiangqinzh 时间: 2006-12-16 21:09

原文这样说,因此选E

"An Act to make further provision for the removal and accommodation of the Government of the United States," approved April 24, 1800 National Archives and Records Administration, Records of the U.S. Senate

搜索了原文,觉得A的逻辑意思不对

act是法令,provision规定

E Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new

federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing the Library of Congress.

是法令在April 24, 1800通过,国会的这个法令做出了把美国的政府搬到Washington的规定,

再看A

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established the Library of Congress.

而A 中 Congress that made provision 定语从句通常是就近修饰国会,当然这个逻辑也能说的过去,当然that也可以跳跃修饰act,

但最大的问题是 the act of Congress 中心词是act 建立图书观,显然不合逻辑

而E中also establishing the Library of Congress.是表示伴随结果,跟OG259上那道bringing 一样,这里 establishing 不需要逻辑主语

下面是很好的验证,图书管是" " 的结果

April 24, 1800: The Library of Congress is established by the
"Act to Make Provision for the Removal and Accommodation of the Government of the U.S." While originally only members of Congress and other government officials are allowed to use the facilities, it later opens its doors to the public.

http://law.enotes.com/federal-about/chronology

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-16 21:21:23编辑过]

作者: ptr07 时间: 2006-12-24 06:51
The only problem with A is the , "also" can not connect sentence

作者: zxzhyzcy 时间: 2007-6-16 18:01

对于ＯＧ来说，一个名词的前面或者后面连着跟两个修饰成分很有歧义而且也不简洁，我觉得Ｂ和Ｄ就错在这里……

Ｃ和Ｅ错得更明显了吧……

作者: idleguy77 时间: 2007-6-16 21:30

请问一下，A中的also，可以像and一样连接两个谓语动词么？

谢谢

作者: lolita0320 时间: 2007-8-20 18:04
请问A的主干是什么？我怎么分析的是A不是一个完整的句子呢？approved....., the act that...., and also...

作者: yukee820 时间: 2007-8-28 15:09

以下是引用lolita0320在2007-8-20 18:04:00的发言：
请问A的主干是什么？我怎么分析的是A不是一个完整的句子呢？approved....., the act that...., and also...

同问

established 和哪个动词并列啊?

哪位牛人给分析一下句子的结构吧???

万分感谢

作者: JUJUCHENG 时间: 2007-9-8 10:03

不是牛人，分析一下：

A中，主语是the act(法案），谓语是established。

also是副词，不是连词，因此不涉及和哪个动词并列的问题。

that引出的定语从句修饰the act；

Washington,D.C是插入语，做city的同位语。

作者: woyuhong 时间: 2007-10-7 20:41
我不选A的唯一原因就是that指代有歧义，有可能指代congress，而不是act

作者: suffisait 时间: 2007-12-1 16:14

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established
The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

这里的making属于夹心饼干，可以向前修饰act，或者向后修饰谓语。但不会造成修饰APRIL的歧义，这种结构大全里很多，动名词结构基本会跳过非限制性定语从句去修饰前面的东西

The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established

歧义：act approved...,and established... 好象2个谓语动词。至于WHICH我觉得不是歧义的根本，至少不是很重要

Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established

我觉得这个倒不是很明显的修饰歧义，而是因为这个结构本身就不是很好，我发现EST总对特定的句子有特定的表达。比如这个done,doing, S+V+O. 就没有done,S,doing,V+O. 好。

Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing

这个我觉得是句子重心问题，而且如果是伴随的话，aslo就不对了啊

以上是我个人看法，大家讨论。

作者: mmandli 时间: 2008-3-2 02:20

我发现EST总对特定的句子有特定的表达。比如这个done,doing, S+V+O. 就没有done,S,doing,V+O. 好。

楼上说的有道理。

作者: MarilynR 时间: 2008-6-8 01:30

以下是引用woyuhong在2007-10-7 20:41:00的发言：
我不选A的唯一原因就是that指代有歧义，有可能指代congress，而不是act

同感！

恳请哪位NN帮忙分析一下。

新东方的石林语法说过which可以跳跃修饰，最多往前跳一个，难道that也可以跳跃修饰act吗？

作者: ricky_w 时间: 2008-7-19 15:53
多谢，明白

作者: bmwedward 时间: 2008-8-14 13:15

以下是引用pebbles在2005-9-26 10:38:00的发言：

A "Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established"

这个句子很好,但是为什么主语the act of Congress和谓语also established之间有个逗号呢?这样不是fragmented sentences吗? 如果没有这个逗号, A应该是最好的.

哪位在OG中看过这种长主语和谓语之间用逗号分开的,请指点一下!

大大請注意, 這逗點是修飾the new federal city的同位語, Washington, D.D., 所以A沒有問題

作者: bmwedward 时间: 2008-8-14 13:21

以下是引用yukee820在2007-8-28 15:09:00的发言：

同问

established 和哪个动词并列啊?

哪位牛人给分析一下句子的结构吧???

万分感谢

不是牛人是路人, 小弟看法

應表達為此句

The act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., was approved April 24, 1800 and also established the Library of Congress.

所以才會有also的出現, 至於D.C., 後面這各逗點只是同位語!!

Open to discussion

作者: sfan201 时间: 2008-8-23 15:58

同意选A

而且E选项在the act of Congress后少了个that，定从that做主语不能省略，在此省了会让人误解是过去分词做后置定语，这样逻辑就不对了。

作者: fiona8718 时间: 2008-10-2 19:45

GWD-12-Q20:

A. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established（是句子的谓语，而E 改为establishing, 把好好的主句变成了伴随，是把好好的女主人变成小保姆，改变了原文的意思）

B. The act of Congress, which was approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also established

C. The act of Congress approved April 24, 1800, which made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., and established

D. Approved April 24, 1800, making provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., the act of Congress also established

E. Approved April 24, 1800, the act of Congress made provision for the removal of the government of the United States to the new federal city, Washington, D.C., also establishing

作者: phyroc 时间: 2008-10-7 23:41

除了其它原因，有没有可能是also的原因？

also表示并列发生的动作，A中establish和made都是过去式，并列比较好，而E中establishing和made并列有点awkward。

在OG中好像没看到过有a do b, also doing c这种结构，有吗？没有吗？有吗？反正后天上考场了，指望不上这个问题的最终答案了...

作者: lugb 时间: 2008-10-7 23:54
also是adv,不是连词

作者: mcwEnquxiN 时间: 2008-11-19 20:50

恩

also是副词,修饰established

(Approved April 24, 1800, )the act of Congress that made provision for the removal of the

主语

government of the United States to (the new federal city/, Washington, D.C.,同位语)

(also adv.也) established
the Library of Congress.

谓语宾语

作者: 吴羽若 时间: 2008-12-8 22:00

以下是引用bmwedward在2008-8-14 13:15:00的发言：

大大請注意, 這逗點是修飾the new federal city的同位語, Washington, D.D., 所以A沒有問題

嗯，这个说的很对，现在我决定选A了。

作者: laura466 时间: 2009-7-20 11:22
up

作者: happyggggg 时间: 2009-10-8 06:00

答案是E，also establishing 分词做伴随的状语

A选项不够简洁，使得主谓分的太远，不够清晰明了。

阅读了谈毅ｇｇ的语法笔记，发现第四页，findjuhl我们谈毅ｇｇ也犯错误啊

作者: jillchenyy 时间: 2009-10-13 14:24

大概你的声音太小了，我帮你问一下。有NN路过吗？

作者: jillchenyy 时间: 2009-10-17 11:45

操作失误,请问这里的时间前面为什么不用介词at?

作者: tsqqq_ny 时间: 2010-1-8 06:53
各位nn, 我有一事不明：
A中为什么主语和谓语之间要用逗号隔开？好像这个逗号不必要吧？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)